Article thumbnail

Comparing Welfare Estimates from Fixed Status Quo Attributes vs People’s Perceived Attributes of Water Quality

By Dan Marsh and Lena Asimenye Mkwara

Abstract

Data from a choice experiment on the community’s preferences for water quality improvements in streams was used to assess the effect of using a fixed status quo versus people’s perceived status quo on willingness to pay values. More than 50% of respondents perceived the quality of water in streams to be different to the status quo in the initial experimental design. Study results have shown that respondents who opted for their own perceived status quo alternative had stronger preferences and higher willing to pay for water quality improvements than their counterparts.Choice experiments, Fixed status quo, People’s perceived status quo, Willingness to pay, Agricultural and Food Policy, Community/Rural/Urban Development, Crop Production/Industries, Environmental Economics and Policy, Farm Management, Health Economics and Policy, Land Economics/Use,

OAI identifier:
Downloaded from http://purl.umn.edu/97155

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. Bell, Nimmo‐Bell Benett, modelling Limited. Broadnax, the Brownstone, Substitution Campbell, into Desvouges, improvements: Environmental Diamond, of