Location of Repository

The Methodology of Normative Policy Analysis

By Christopher Robert and Richard Zeckhauser

Abstract

Policy analyses frequently clash. Their disagreements stem from many sources, including models, empirical estimates, and values such as who should have standing and how different criteria should be weighted. We provide a simple taxonomy of disagreement, identifying distinct categories within both the positive and values domains of normative policy analysis. Using disagreements in climate policy to illustrate, we demonstrate how illuminating the structure of disagreement helps to clarify the way forward. We conclude by suggesting a structure for policy analysis that can facilitate assessment, comparison, and debate by laying bare the most likely sources of disagreement.

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2009). 1). No Big Cost Rise In
  2. (2008). 20 reasons why geoengineering may be a bad idea. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists,
  3. (2009). 26). Health Care Reform and You. The New York Times.
  4. (2008). A broader view of the role of humans in the climate system.
  5. (1978). A primer for policy analysis.
  6. (2007). A review of the Stern Review on the economics of climate change.
  7. (2008). Addressing climate change with a comprehensive US cap-and-trade system.
  8. (2008). An Even Sterner Review: Introducing Relative Prices into the Discounting Debate. Rev Environ Econ Policy,
  9. (2008). Atmospheric justice.
  10. (2004). Balance as bias: global warming and the US prestige press.
  11. (2007). Climate Change
  12. (2010). Climate Change Justice.
  13. (2007). CLIMATE CHANGE: The Limits of Consensus.
  14. (2007). Climate Change: The Uncertainties, the Certainties and What They Imply About Action. The Economists' Voice,
  15. (2010). Climate Risk. Annual Review of Environment and Resources,
  16. (2007). Commentary: The Stern review’s economics of climate change. National Institute Economic Review,
  17. (1991). Congress Writes a Law: Research and Welfare Reform.
  18. (2009). Costing Clunkers: The Problem of Scope Neglect.
  19. (1987). Datawars: the politics of modeling in Federal policymaking.
  20. (1993). Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-offs. New York:
  21. (2008). Discounting climate change.
  22. (1956). Economic commentaries.
  23. (1998). Economists' Views about Parameters, Values, and Policies: Survey Results in Labor and Public Economics.
  24. (1993). Editors' Introduction. In
  25. (2010). Expert credibility in climate change.
  26. (2003). From research to social policy and back again: Translating scholarship into practice through the starry eyes of a sometimes scarred veteran.
  27. (2000). GEOENGINEERING THE CLIMATE: History and Prospect. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment,
  28. (2009). Going to Extremes.
  29. (1997). Golden Eggs and Hyperbolic Discounting.
  30. (1993). Guidelines for Policy Discourse: Consensual versus Adversarial. In
  31. (1996). How Do Senators Vote? Disentangling the Role of Voter Preferences, Party Affiliation, and Senator Ideology.
  32. (2004). How science makes environmental controversies worse.
  33. (2009). Human development report
  34. (2006). Intergenerational and International Discounting. In Strategies of commitment and other essays.
  35. (2007). IPCC Working Group I.
  36. (2002). It pays to be ignorant: a simple political economy of rigorous program evaluation.
  37. (1974). Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.
  38. (1994). Managing the global commons: the economics of climate change.
  39. (2007). Measure for Measure: The case for a national wellbeing index.
  40. (2000). Minimum Wages and Employment: A Case Study of the Fast-Food Industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania: Reply.
  41. (1997). Myth and measurement: the new economics of the minimum Christopher John wage.
  42. (1998). Policy Analysis and Evidence: A Craft Perspective.
  43. (2005). Policy analysis: concepts and practice (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River,
  44. (2008). Policymaking for posterity.
  45. (2009). Probabilistic Forecast for Twenty-First-Century Climate Based on Uncertainties in Emissions (Without Policy) and Climate Parameters.
  46. (2002). Problems in evaluating regional and local trends in temperature: an example from Christopher John eastern Colorado,
  47. (1982). Professional Roles for Policy Analysts: A Critical Assessment.
  48. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit.
  49. (2004). Science and public policy: what's proof got to do with it?
  50. (2009). Should Greenhouse Gas Permits Be Allocated on a Per Capita Basis?
  51. (1992). Some Economics of Global Warming.
  52. (1991). Strategy and choice.
  53. (2007). Taking GreenHouse Warming Seriously. Energy &
  54. (1963). The arms debate.
  55. (1995). The Common Prior Assumption in Economic Theory.
  56. (1999). The Costs of Carbon Sequestration: A Revealed-Preference Approach.
  57. (2009). The geoengineering option.
  58. (2007). The honest broker: making sense of science in policy and politics.
  59. (2009). The Idea of Justice.
  60. (1986). The Issue of Standing in Cost-Benefit Analysis.
  61. (1953). The Methodology of Positive Economics.
  62. (1978). The Origin and Meaning of Miles'
  63. (2010). The Politics of Happiness.
  64. (1904). The scope and method of political economy.
  65. (2006). The Stern Review: A Dual Critique (Part I: The Science).
  66. (2000). The Value of Nature and the Nature of Value.
  67. (2010). To Uphold the World.
  68. (2000). Towards Consistent Assessment and Reporting of Uncertainties in the IPCC TAR. In
  69. (2009). Uncomfortable Arithmetic -- Whom to Cover versus What to Cover. New England
  70. (1996). Welfare reform as I knew it.
  71. (2000). Welfare Reform in America: A Clash of Politics and Research.
  72. (2006). What Makes Greenhouse Sense?
  73. (1990). Who Has Standing in Cost-Benefit Analysis?

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.