Location of Repository

Deciding to peg the exchange rate in developing countries: the role of private-sector debt

By Philipp Harms and Mathias Hoffmann

Abstract

We argue that a higher share of the private sector in a country's external debt raises the incentive to stabilize the exchange rate. We present a simple model in which exchange rate volatility does not affect agents' welfare if all the debt is incurred by the government. Once we introduce private banks who borrow in foreign currency and lend to domestic firms, the monetary authority has an incentive to dampen the distributional consequences of exchange rate fluctuations. Our empirical results support the hypothesis that not only the level, but also the composition of foreign debt matters for exchange-rate policy. --Exchange rate regimes,foreign debt,monetary policy

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2006). Choosing (and Reneging on) Exchange Rate Regimes”,
  2. (2006). overid: Stata module to calculate tests of overidentifying restrictions after ivreg,
  3. (2002). Fear of Floating”,
  4. (2009). Exploring Different Views of Exchange-Rate Regime Choice”,
  5. (2008). A new measure of financial openness”,
  6. (2008). Political pressure and exchange rate stability in emerging market economies”,
  7. (1996). Currency Crashes in Emerging Markets: An Empirical Treatment.”
  8. (2002). Freedom House (various issues): Freedom in the World, data available at http://www.freedomhouse.org/
  9. (1982). Large Sample Properties of Generalized
  10. (2001). Why do countries float the way they float?”,
  11. (2006). Penn World Table Version 6.2”,
  12. (2002). Long-Run Determinants of Exchange Rate Regimes: A Simple Sensitivity Analysis”, IMF Working Paper 02/104.
  13. (2007). The External Wealth of Nations Mark II: Revised and Extended Estimates of Foreign Assets and Liabilities, 1970-2004”,
  14. (1992). Amemiya's Generalized Least Squares and Tests of Overidenfication in Simultaneous Equation Models with Qualitative or Limited Dependent Variables”.
  15. (2003). To Float or to Fix: Evidence on the Impact of Exchange Rate Regimes on Growth”,
  16. (2004). On the Endogeneity of Exchange Rate Regimes”, Revised version of Universidad Torcuato di Tella Business School Working Paper 11/2002.
  17. (2002). The viability of fixed exchange rate commitments: Does politics matter? A theoretical and empirical investigation"
  18. (1987). Efficient Estimation of Limited Dependent Variable Models with Endogeneous Explanatory Variables".
  19. (2001). How Do Countries Choose Their Exchange Rate Regime?”, IMF Working Paper 01/46.
  20. (2004). The Modern History of Exchange Rate Arrangements: A Reinterpretation“,
  21. (1998). The Economic Determinants of the Choice of an Exchange Rate Regime: A Probit Analysis”,
  22. (2008). The classification and performance of alternative exchange-rate regimes”,
  23. (2007). The Choice of Exchange Rate Regimes in Developing Countries:
  24. (2002). Econometric Analysis of Cross-Section and Panel Data”,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.