Location of Repository

Cross-cultural comparisons of consumer satisfaction ratings : a perspective from Albert Hirschman’s theory.

By Lola C. Duque and Nora Lado

Abstract

Purpose This paper seeks to propose Albert Hirschman’s theory of “exit, voice and loyalty” as a complementary conceptual framework to Hofstede’s cultural dimensions and use them in conjunction to compare consumer satisfaction with services across cultures. Design/methodology/approach A model of satisfaction with complex services (higher education) is developed and then tested in two different cultures, Colombia and Spain, with a sample of 879 students. Structural equation modeling based on the partial least squares algorithm is used to test the proposed model. Findings Colombian students are more satisfied with the educational system than Spanish ones. This is explained by cultural and contextual differences that pose greater restrictions on accessibility to higher education, provide fewer choice alternatives and present more switching costs for the Colombian student. Originality/value This study applies the conditions of Hirschman’s theory in an international setting, offering a rich basis for understanding differences in consumer satisfaction that accounts for intra national diversityCustomer satisfaction; National cultures; Higher education; Students; Colombia; Spain;

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2000). A comprehensive framework for service quality: an investigation of critical conceptual and measurement issues through a longitudinal study”,
  2. (1993). An examination of the effect of product performance on brand reputation, satisfaction and loyalty”,
  3. (1999). Assessing the teaching quality to student satisfaction relationship: applied customer satisfaction research in the classroom”,
  4. (1988). Confucius connection: from cultural roots to economic growth source”,
  5. (1980). Consumer dissatisfaction and complaining behaviour as feedback: a comparative analysis of public and private delivery systems”,
  6. (1985). Consumer responses to dissatisfaction in loose monopolies”,
  7. (2008). Consumer responses to service failures: a resource preference model of cultural influences”,
  8. (2000). Cross level effects of class characteristics on students’ perceptions of teaching quality”,
  9. (2006). Cultural differences in, and influences on, consumers’ propensity to adopt innovations”,
  10. (1998). Cultural influences on service quality expectations”,
  11. (1998). Customer loyalty and complex services: the impact of corporate image on quality, customer satisfaction and loyalty for customers with varying degrees of service expertise”,
  12. (2001). Customer satisfaction: a meta analysis of the empirical evidence”,
  13. (2008). Data equivalence in cross cultural international business research: assessment and guidelines”,
  14. (2005). Dimensions of service quality in developed and developing economies: multi country cross cultural comparisons”,
  15. (1975). Dropout from higher education: a theoretical synthesis of recent research”,
  16. (2007). E learning and the development of “Voice” in business studies education”,
  17. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error”,
  18. (1970). Exit, Voice and Loyalty Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations and States,
  19. (2008). Geert Hofstede Cultural Dimensions (2008), “Geert Hofstede Dimensions raw scores for 56 countries and regions”, available at: www.geert hofstede.com/ (accessed
  20. (2001). Index construction with formative indicators: an alternative to scale development”,
  21. (1991). Industry characteristics and consumer dissatisfaction”,
  22. (1994). International services marketing: a comparative evaluation of the dimensions of service quality between developedanddevelopingcountries”,InternationalMarketingReview,Vol.11No.2,pp.5 15.
  23. (1995). Managing service quality in higher education: the role of the student as primary consumer”,
  24. (2002). Measuring cross cultural service quality: a framework for assessment”,
  25. (1991). Methodology in cross cultural consumer research: a review and critical assessment”,
  26. (1978). Psychometric Theory, 2nd ed., Willey,
  27. (1995). Self assessment Guidelines for Public Sector: Education, European Foundation for Quality Management,
  28. (2007). Service quality and satisfaction: an international comparison of professional services perceptions”,
  29. (2004). Service quality perceptions and customer satisfaction: evaluating the role of culture”,
  30. (1999). Student involvement: a developmental theory for higher education”,
  31. (1996). The American customer satisfaction index: nature, purpose, and findings”,
  32. (2007). The changing expectations of consumers in cross culturalserviceencounters”,InternationalManagementReview,Vol.3No.3,pp.27 35.
  33. (2008). The cross cultural research imperative: the need to balance cross national and intra national diversity”,
  34. (2005). The Dilemma of the unsatisfied customer in a market model of public administration”,
  35. (2001). The evolution and future of national customer satisfaction index models”,
  36. (2008). The long term stock market valuation of customer satisfaction”,
  37. (2000). The relationships between culture and service quality perceptions: basis for cross cultural market segmentation and resource allocation”,
  38. (2001). The role of national culture in international marketing research”,
  39. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies”,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.