Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Cohort change, diffusion, and support for gender egalitarianism in cross-national perspective

By Fred Pampel

Abstract

Arguments about the spread of gender egalitarian values through a population highlight several sources of change. First, structural arguments point to increases in the proportion of women with high education, jobs with good pay, commitment to careers outside the family, and direct interests in gender equality. Second, value-shift arguments contend that gender norms change with economic affluence among women and men in diverse positions—at all levels of education, for example. Third, diffusion arguments suggest that structural changes lead to adoption of new ideas and values supportive of gender equality by innovative, high-education groups, but that the new ideas later diffuse to other groups. This study tests these arguments by using International Social Survey Program surveys in 1988, 1994, and 2002 for 19 nations to examine gender egalitarianism across 85 cohorts born from roughly 1900 to 1984. Multilevel models support diffusion arguments by demonstrating that the effects of education first strengthen with early adoption of gender egalitarianism and then weaken as other groups come to accept the same views. However, the evidence of a sequence of divergence and convergence in educational differences across cohorts appears most clearly for women in Western nations.cohort, diffusion, education, gender, gender equality, ISSP

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2006). A mixed models approach to the age-period-cohort analysis of repeated cross-section surveys, with an application to data on trends in verbal test scores.
  2. (1988). Attitudes toward women’s familial roles:
  3. (2006). Century of difference: How America changed in the last one hundred years.
  4. (2000). Change in gender ideology, 1977-1996: The contributions of intracohort change and population turnover.
  5. (1995). Changes in gender role attitudes and perceived marital quality.
  6. (2001). Changes in men’s conservative gender ideologies: Cohort and period influences.
  7. (1993). Changes in U.S. men’s attitudes toward the family provider role,
  8. (1980). Changing attitudes toward women’s nonfamily roles:
  9. (2011). Cohort changes in the socio-demographic determinants of gender egalitarianism.
  10. (1988). Cultural dynamics and economic theories of fertility change.
  11. (1989). Culture shift in advanced industrial society.
  12. (1985). Demographic Research: Volume 25, Article 21 http://www.demographic-research.org 693
  13. (1995). Dependence and independence: A cross-national analysis of gender inequality and gender attitudes.
  14. (1998). Destined for equality: The inevitable rise of women’s status.
  15. (1998). Diffusion in organizations and social movements: From hybrid corn to poison pills.
  16. (2003). Diffusion of innovations, Fifth Edition.
  17. (2000). Do gender role attitudes matter?
  18. (2002). Equal but separate? A cross-national study of sex segregation in higher education.
  19. (2005). Explaining educational influences on attitudes toward homosexual relations.
  20. (1994). Family status and criticism of gender inequality at home and at work.
  21. (2004). Feminist attitudes and support for gender equality: Opinion change in women and men 1974-1998.
  22. (2001). Four decades of trends in attitudes toward family issues in the United States: The 1960s through the 1990s.
  23. (1996). Generational changes in gender-role attitudes: Britain in a cross-national perspective.
  24. (1992). Housewives and employed wives: Demographic and attitudinal change 1972-1986.
  25. (1993). Institutional conditions for diffusion.
  26. (2011). International Social Survey Program (ISSP).
  27. (1990). Macro-micro links in gender stratification:
  28. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values.
  29. (2001). Press. Demographic Research: Volume 25,
  30. (2010). Reconciling studies of men’s gender attitudes and fertility: Response to Westoff and Higgins.
  31. (1998). Religion and declining support for traditional beliefs about gender roles and homosexual rights.
  32. (2003). Rising tide: Gender equality and cultural change. New York:
  33. (2008). Sweden: Combining childbearing and gender equality. Demographic Research
  34. (1965). The cohort as a concept in the study of social change.
  35. (1993). The diffusion of fertility control in Taiwan: Evidence from pooled cross-section time-series models.
  36. (2009). The interaction of race and gender: Changing gender-role attitudes,
  37. (1992). The separation of work and the family: Attitudes towards women’s labour-force participation in Germany, Great Britain, and the United States.
  38. (2010). The unfolding story of the second demographic transition.
  39. (1978). Urban-to-rural diffusion of opinions in contemporary America.
  40. (2003). Who are feminists and what do they believe? The role of generations.
  41. (1981). Wives’ employment, household behaviors, and sex-role attitudes.
  42. (1996). Women, work and children: Behavioral and attitudinal change in the United States. Population and Development Review 22(3):
  43. (1988). Work life, family life, and women’s support of feminism.
  44. (1985). Working wives and women’s rights: The connection between the employment status of wives and the feminist attitudes of husbands.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.