Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Wages and labor income in history : a survey.

By Leandro Prados de la Escosura and Joan R. Rosés


Income distribution has been a main topic in economics since the days of Gregory King and William Petty. In this paper some empirical issues in the study of labor income are surveyed in the light of economic history, including the hypothesis of the stability of factor shares across time and space and the relative importance of raw labor and human capital in labor income.

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1997). A Labor Income-Based Measure of the Value of Human Capital: An application to the States of United States”,
  2. (1965). Das Wachstum der Deutschen Wirtschaft seit der Mitte des 19. Jahrhunderts.
  3. (1980). Economic Growth, 1947-73: An International Comparison”,
  4. (2000). Edwin Horlings and Jan Luiten van Zanden
  5. (1960). Factor Shares, 1850-1910”,
  6. (2001). Getting Income Shares Right”, mimeo,
  7. (1987). Growth and Slowdown in Advanced Capitalist Economies: Techniques of Quantitative Assessment”,
  8. (1998). Human Capital in Sweden”, mimeo,
  9. (1968). Income Distribution. I Functional Share”,
  10. (1960). Labor’s Share and ‘Wage Parity’.”
  11. (1999). Measuring Labor’s Share.
  12. (1998). Measuring the Contribution of Human Capital to the Development of catalan factory system (1830-61),
  13. (1966). Modern Economic Growth. Rate, Structure, and Spread.
  14. (1982). Odling-Smee
  15. (1990). Productivity and Economic Growth”,
  16. (1973). Reinterpreting Economic Growth: Parables and Realities”,
  17. (1939). Relative Movements of Real Wages and Output”,
  18. (1957). The Conditions of Economic Progress. 3 rd edition.
  19. (1990). The Dutch Economy 1921-39: Revised Macroeconomic data for the Interwar Period”,
  20. (1954). The Functional Distribution of Income in the United States, 1850-1952”,
  21. (1962). The Structure of Income: Some Quantitative Essays.
  22. (1995). The Tyranny of Numbers: Confronting the Statistical Realities of East Asian Growth Experiences”,
  23. (1967). Why Growth Rates Differ. Postwar Experience in Nine western Countries.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.