Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

A Model of Overconfidence

By Bruce A. Weinberg


People use information about their ability to choose tasks. If more challenging tasks provide more accurate information about ability, people who care about and who are risk averse over their perception of their own ability will choose tasks that are not sufficiently challenging. Overestimation of ability raises utility by deluding people into believing that they are more able than they are in fact. Moderate overestimation of ability and overestimation of the precision of initial information leads people to choose tasks that raise expected output, however extreme overconfidence leads people to undertake tasks that are excessively challenging. Consistent with our results, psychologists have found that moderate overconfidence is both pervasive and advantageous and that people maintain such beliefs by underweighting new information about their ability.overconfidence, behavioral economics, information processing

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1991). Is Depressive Realism Real?”
  2. Judgement of Contingency in Depressed and Nondepressed Students: Sadder but Wiser?”
  3. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control.”
  4. (1999). Self-Confidence: Intrapersonal Strategies.” Working Paper, Université des Sciences Sociales,
  5. (1999). Self-Confidence: Interpersonal Strategies.” Working Paper, Université des Sciences Sociales,
  6. (1967). Depression: Clinical Experimental, and Theoretical Aspects.
  7. (1999). On the Evolution of Overconfidence and Entrepreneurs.” Working Paper.
  8. (1998). The Self” in The Handbook of Social Psychology, Volume I.
  9. (1995). The Thrill of Victory, the Complexity of Defeat: Self-Esteem and People’s Emotional Reactions to Success and Failure.”
  10. (2000). Strategic Ignorance as a Self-Disciplining Device.”
  11. (1994). Positive Illusions and Well-Being Revisited Separating Fiction from
  12. (1997). The Effects of Clinical Depression on Schooling and Wages. Doctoral Dissertation, The Ohio State University.
  13. (1998). Investor Psychology and Security Market Under-
  14. (1991). The Survival of Noise Traders in financial
  15. (1989). A Conceptual and Empirical Review of the Depressive Realism Hypothesis.”
  16. (1986). Introduction.”
  17. (2004). Overconfidence and Team Coordination.” Working paper, Duke University.
  18. (1999). Ignorance is Bliss.” Working Paper,
  19. (2000). Ego Utility, Overconfidence,
  20. (2000). Ego Utility and Information Acquisition.” Working Paper,
  21. (1997). Speculation Duopoly with Agreement to Disagree: Can Overconfidence Survive the Market Test?”
  22. (1975). Self-Serving Biases in the Attribution of Causality:
  23. (1965). Overconfidence in Case-Study Judgements.”
  24. (1985). Depression and Evaluative Schemata.”
  25. (1975). Responses to Evaluation as a Function of Initial Self-Perceptions.”
  26. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of The Wealth of Nations. Chicago:
  27. (1991). Esteem Protection or Enhancement? Self-Handicapping Motives and Attributions Differ by Trait Self-Esteem.”
  28. (1994). Systematic Errors and the Theory of
  29. (1979). Attribution of Success and Failure Revisited, or: The Motivational Bias is Alive and Well in Attribution Theory.”

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.