Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Testing the Behavior of Romanian Households

By Bianca Pauna


This article aims to answer questions related to which model is more adequate to describe the Romanian household’s behavior. There are two types of models, which are used whenever one attempts to model household allocation decision: the common utility model and the collective model. In this paper we test both the implications of the common utility model and the implications of the collective model using Romanian household data. The results are very strong. The common utility model fails to describe accurately the household’s behavior, while the restrictions that the collective model imposes on the demand functions are supported by the Romanian household data.household allocation, common utility model, collective model

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1992). Collective labor supply and welfare”,
  2. (1992). Collective models of household behaviour”,
  3. (1997). Do husbands and wives pool their resources?”,
  4. (1980). Economics and Consumer Behaviour, Cambridge:
  5. (1998). Efficient Intra-Household Allocation:
  6. (2008). Efficient intra-household allocations and distribution factors: Implications and identification.
  7. (2001). Household Consumption in the Central and East-European Countries Aspiring to Joint the EU",
  8. (1994). Incomes and outcomes: a structural model of intra-household allocation”,
  9. (1993). Intra household allocation of consumption: A model and some evidence from French data”,
  10. (2000). Intrahousehold Allocation and Gender Relations: New Empirical Evidence from Four Developing Countries,
  11. (1990). Intrahousehold Resource Allocation. An Inferential Approach”,
  12. (2005). Macromodel of the Romanian Market Economy, working paper
  13. (2006). Macromodels of the Romanian Market Economy, Editura Economică,
  14. (2001). Modelling the Intra-Household Allocation Process”,
  15. (1991). Nash-bargained household decision: A rejoinder”,
  16. (1983). Necessary and sufficient conditions for conditional cost functions”,
  17. (1988). Rational household labour supply”,
  18. (1994). Sex sharing and the distribution of income”,
  19. (1990). Testing the neoclassical model of Family Labour Supply and Fertility”,
  20. (1993). The Allocation of Consumption by Married-Couple Families in the US: An Analysis Conditioning on Labor Supply”,
  21. (1993). The Distribution of Income and Expenditure within the Household”, Annales d’Economie et de
  22. (1981). Theoretical and Empirical Approaches to Consumer Demand Under Rationing”, in Essays in the Theory and Measurement of Consumer Behaviour, ed by A.S. Deaton. Cambridge:

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.