Location of Repository

Finland’s Path to the Global Productivity Frontier through Creative Destruction

By Mika Maliranta, Petri Rouvinen and Pekka Ylä-Anttila


The marked acceleration of Finnish productivity growth since the mid-1980s is attributable to intensifying creative destruction, understood as the joint effect of market entry and exit as well as resource reallocation between continuing plants and firms. This acceleration coincided with the economy-wide deregulation, liberalization, and the opening up of Finland, which provided new incentives and opportunities, thus enabling individuals and businesses to capitalize on intangible capital accumulated via sustained investment since World War II. The “Nokia effect” was particularly important in the latter half of the 1990s, but productivity enhancing restructuring has been more widespread. Developments in Finland are contrasted to those in Japan, Sweden, and the United States.creative destruction, productivity, growth, public policy, Finland

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles



  1. (2010). (eds.) How Revolutionary Was the Digital Revolution? National Responses, Market Transitions, and Global Technology
  2. (2004). Assessing Aggregate Labour Productivity Trends in Canada and the United States: Total Economy versus Business Sector Perspectives,"
  3. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy
  4. (2008). Competitive Intensity as Driver Of Innovation and Productivity Growth: A Synthesis Of The Literature,"
  5. (2006). Distance to Frontier, Selection, and Economic Growth,"
  6. (2002). Do Conglomerate Firms Allocate Resources Inefficiently across Industries? Theory and Evidence,"
  7. (2007). Economic and Industrial Policy Transformations in Finland,"
  8. (2009). Economic Prosperity Recaptured. The Finnish Path from Crisis to Rapid Growth (Cambridge:
  9. (2009). Evaluation of the Finnish National Innovation System.
  10. (2006). Finland's Emergence as a Global Information and Communications Technology Player: Lessons from the Finnish Wireless Cluster,"
  11. (2010). Firm LifeCycles and External Restructuring," Unpublished manuscript,
  12. (1995). Firm Productivity in Israeli Industry: 1979-1988,"
  13. Fox (2009) "On Measuring the Contribution of Entering and Exiting Firms to Aggregate Productivity Growth,"
  14. (2008). GGDC Productivity Level Database: International Comparison of Output, Inputs and Productivity at the Industry Level,"
  15. (1999). Gross Job Flows,"
  16. (2008). ICT Production and Productivity in Sweden and Finland, 1975-2004,"
  17. (2009). In Search of an Ideal Method for Analyzing Micro-Level Dynamics of a Great Productivity Leap," paper presented at the Comparative Analysis of Entreprise Data (CAED),
  18. (2005). Index Number Theory Using Differences Rather than Ratios,"
  19. (1993). International Comparisons of Output and Productivity: manufacturing productivity performance of ten countries from 1950 to
  20. (2001). Labor Productivity: Structural Change and Cyclical Dynamics,"
  21. (1997). Measuring and Analyzing Aggregate Fluctuations: The Importance of Building from Microeconomic Evidence," Federal Reserve Bank of St.
  22. (2003). Micro Level Dynamics of Productivity Growth. An Empirical Analysis of the Great Leap in Finnish Manufacturing Productivity in 1975-2000 (Helsinki: Taloustieto Oy).
  23. (2009). Mistä koko kansantalouden työn tuottavuuden kasvu on tehty?"
  24. (2006). On spurious differences in growth performance and on the misuse of National Accounts data for governance purposes,"
  25. (2009). Output, Input and Productivity Measures at the Industry Level: The EU KLEMS Database,"
  26. (1997). Plant-level explanations for the catch-up process in Finnish manufacturing: a decomposition of aggregate labour productivity growth,"
  27. (1992). Productivity dynamics in manufacturing plants,"
  28. (2006). Productivity Growth: The Role of Human Capital and Technology,"
  29. (2006). Productivity Levels in Distributive Trades: A New ICOP Dataset for OECD Countries,"
  30. (2002). Projecting Productivity Growth: Lessons from the U.S. Growth Resurgence,"
  31. (2005). R&D, International Trade and Creative Destruction - Empirical Findings from Finnish Manufacturing Industries,"
  32. (2003). Regulation, productivity and growth: OECD evidence,"
  33. (1996). Suomen tehdasteollisuuden tuottavuus; kansainvälinen tasovertailu (Productivity
  34. (1999). Technology and Skill Upgrading: Results from Linked Worker-Plant Data for Finnish Manufacturing,"
  35. (2009). Ten Years of Product Market Reform in OECD Countries - Insights from a Revised PMR Indicator," OECD Economics Department, Working Papers No.
  36. (2009). The Economics of Growth (Cambridge:
  37. (2009). The Effects of Entry on Inc-umbent Innovation and Productivity,"
  38. (2007). The MicroLevel Dynamics of Regional Productivity Growth: The Source of Divergence in Finland,"
  39. (2003). The Residual: On Monitoring and Benchmarking Firms, Industries, and Economies with Respect to Productivity,"
  40. (2005). Unnatural Selection: Perverse Incentives and the Misallocation of Credit in Japan,"
  41. (2010). What Determines Productivity?"
  42. (2006). Why Do Japan's TFP Growth Slow Down in the Lost Decade? An Empirical Analysis Based on Firm-Level Data on Manufacturing Firms,"
  43. (2008). Zombie Lending and Depressed Restructuring in Japan,"

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.