Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Poverty trends since the transition: What we know

By Servaas van der Berg, Megan Louw and Leon du Toit


Using alternative data sources on income and poverty with a shorter time lag makes it possible to discern trends that can inform the policy debate. A strong decline in poverty rates was recorded since 2000. This has since been confirmed by General Household Survey data that showed that the proportion of households with children reporting that their children had gone hungry in the previous year had almost halved between 2002 and 2006. This policy success would not have been tracked using the less regular and more conventional data sources such as the Income and Expenditure Survey of 2000 (IES2000). One successful policy measure – the social grant system – can be clearly identified. Through the child support grants, much of the expansion of the grants system was targeted at children. In contrast, other areas of policy intervention, in particular social delivery in health and education, have been far less successful. This Working Paper is part of longer, ongoing research on poverty and social poverty in the Department of Economics at Stellenbosch University. It first appeared as a publication that attempted to make available some of these research results to a wider public in an accessible and non-technical format.Poverty, Inequality, Redistribution, Fiscal incidence, Social delivery, South Africa

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2005). 43 _ Poverty trends since the transition
  2. (2002). A new face for private providers in developing countries: What implications for public health? Mimeo. London: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
  3. (2006). analysed the income distribution using the IES/OHS1995 and IES2000/LFS2000:2 (i.e.
  4. (2004). Changing patterns of South African income distribution: Towards time series estimates of distribution and poverty. South African journal of economics 72(3):
  5. (1999). Development as Freedom.
  6. (2002). Earning and spending in South Africa: Selected findings and comparisons from the income and expenditure surveys of
  7. (2003). Global poverty: National accounts based versus survey based estimates. Development and change 34(4):
  8. (2006). Health care provider choice. Stellenbosch economic working paper 11/06.
  9. (1997). Health policy in poor countries:
  10. (2006). Income poverty in 2004: A second engagement with the recent Van der Berg et al figures.
  11. (2005). Incomes in South Africa since the fall of apartheid. NBER working paper 11384.
  12. (2004). Increases in poverty in South Africa,
  13. (2007). Labor supply responses to large social transfers: Longitudinal evidence from South Africa.
  14. (2003). Labour market challenges in the post-apartheid South Africa.
  15. (2004). Labour migration and households: A reconsideration of the effects of the social pension on labour supply in South Africa. Paper to the African Econometrics Society conference,
  16. (1998). Large cash transfers to the elderly in South Africa.
  17. (2006). Measuring recent changes in South African inequality and poverty using
  18. (2004). Not separate, not equal: Poverty and inequality in post-apartheid South Africa.
  19. (2006). Other recent studies that corroborate Stats SA’s claims regarding the path of poverty in the first half a decade after the transition include those by Hoogeveen and Özler
  20. (1999). Patient choice of primary health care provider.
  21. (2006). Poverty and inequality in postapartheid South Africa:
  22. (1995). Public spending on health care and the poor.
  23. (2006). Shifts in non-income welfare in South Africa:
  24. (2003). South Africa human development report 2003: The challenge of sustainable development. UNDP South Africa:
  25. (2003). The demand for health care in South Africa. Stellenbosch economic working paper 11/06.
  26. (2007). The role of school improvement in economic development. NBER Working Paper 12832.
  27. (2005). The sensitivity of estimates of post-apartheid changes in South African poverty and inequality to key data imputations. CSSR working paper No. 106. Cape Town:
  28. (2006). Undoing the apartheid legacy: Pro-poor spending shifts in the South African public school system. Perspectives in education 24(2).
  29. (2002). Urban-rural inequalities in health: Evidence from the South African Demographic and Health Survey (DHS). Country background report for FASID.
  30. (2004). What happened to the distribution of income in South Africa between
  31. (2000). Why do some South African provincial governments spend more on health care than others? Mimeo. Discussion paper. Equity project. Pretoria: Department of Health.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.