Location of Repository

McIntosh and Munk's Supposed Test of the Validity of the E-G Class Schema: A Comment

By Robert Erikson and John H. Goldthorpe

Abstract

--

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. [1]Page 9: [1] Deleted robert
  2. (2007). Class and Status: The Conceptual Distinction and its Empirical Relevance.
  3. (2001). Class, Mobility and Merit: the Experience of Two British Birth Cohorts.
  4. (2003). Earnings, Unemployment and the
  5. (1998). Identifying Class Structures: A Latent Class Analysis of the Criterion-Related and Construct Validity of the Goldthorpe Class Schema.
  6. (1998). Identifying Class Structures: A Latent Class Analysis of the CriterionRelated and Construct Validity of the Goldthorpe Class Schema.
  7. (2000). Intergenerational Mobility of Socio-economic Status in Comparative Perspective.
  8. (2007). Non-Persistent Inequality in Educational Attainment: Evidence from Eight European Countries.
  9. (2007). NonPersistent Inequality in Educational Attainment: Evidence from Eight European Countries.
  10. (2007). On Sociology, 2nd. ed., 2 vols.
  11. (2007). Primary and Secondary Effects in Class Differentials in Educational Attainment: The Transition to A-Levels in England and Wales.
  12. (2006). Social class assignment and mortality in Sweden.
  13. Social Class in Europe: An Introduction to the European Socio-Economic Classification.
  14. Social Class, Family Background and Intergenerational Mobility’. European Economic Review.
  15. (2000). Social mobilitet’
  16. (1992). Testing the Validity of the Goldthorpe Class Scema.
  17. (1992). The Constant Flux: A Study of Class Mobility in Industrial Societies.
  18. (2006). The Economic Basis of Social Class. In
  19. (1998). The ESRC Review of Government Social Classifications. ONS and ESRC,
  20. (2005). The National Statistics SocioEconomic Classification: Origins, Development and Use.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.