Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Does the reason for buying health insurance influence behaviour? CHERE Working Paper 2006/1

By Denzil Fiebig, Elizabeth Savage and Rosalie Viney

Abstract

The inter-relationship between private health insurance cover and hospital utilisation is complex. The current policy approach in Australia appears to rely on relatively simple models of the relationships between health insurance coverage, and public and private hospital use. There is considerable evidence of unexplained heterogeneity among the privately insured population. Heterogeneity of preferences is likely to be important not just in determining the uptake of private health insurance, but also the impact of changes in private health insurance on the use of private treatment. A number of studies have used attitudinal variables to model heterogeneity of preferences in other contexts. This study uses the 2001 ABS National Health Survey to identify ?types? among the insured population using their stated reasons for purchasing private health insurance. We find that insurance type is significantly associated with hospital utilisation, particularly the probability of being admitted as a public or private patient. We also find that the government?s insurance incentives were more attractive to particular types of the insured population. This has implications for the effectiveness of the insurance incentives and for the design of policies that aim to reduce pressure on the public hospital system.Private health insurance, health policy, Australia

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1999). A model of health plan choice: Inferring preferences and perceptions from a combination of revealed preference and attitudinal data.
  2. (2003). Adverse selection and the decline in private health insurance coverage in Australia:
  3. (1989). An econometric analysis of the demand for private health insurance in England and Wales.
  4. (1999). Carrots and sticks: The fall and fall of private health insurance in Australia.
  5. (1993). Constrained choice sets in the U.K. Demand for private medical insurance.
  6. (2005). Converting or not converting to organic farming in Austria: Farmer types and their rationale.
  7. (1999). Does the UK have a private welfare class?
  8. (2001). Health insurance and health services utilization in Ireland.
  9. (2006). Healthy, wealthy and insured? The role of self-assessed health in the demand for private health insurance. https://zeus.econ.umd.edu/cgibin/conference/download.cgi?db_name=esam06&paper_id=185 [Accessed:
  10. (2004). Insurance and the utilization of medical services.
  11. (2002). Policy change and private health insurance: Did the cheapest policy do the trick?
  12. (1995). Risk-taking activities and heterogeneity of job-risk tradeoffs.
  13. (2000). The demand for private health care in the UK.
  14. (2001). The effect of health on acute care supplemental insurance ownership: An empirical analysis.
  15. (2006). The effect of managed care on use of health care services: Results from two contemporaneous household surveys.
  16. (2005). The role of the private sector in the Australian healthcare system, in:
  17. (2004). Un-assured instruments: A comment on "Insurance and the utilization of medical services".
  18. (2005). Where do you run after you run for cover? The impact of premium changes on the characteristics of the privately insured in Australia.
  19. (2002). Will subsidising private health insurance help the public health system?
  20. (1999). Willingness to move for work and unemployment duration in Spain.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.