Location of Repository

The concept of odious debt : some considerations

By Vikram Nehru and Mark Thomas

Abstract

Despite the popularity of the term among advocates of debt forgiveness, there is little agreement on a workable definition of"odious"debts and there are but few examples where the concept has been invoked in law to justify non-payment of sovereign debts. Most often, these have been cases when a successor state or government has refused to honor certain debts contracted by its predecessor state or government. Repudiating sovereign debts on broader grounds - such as that money may have been misused by the borrower or that results were not as hoped for at the outset of lending - would create real risks not only of reduced financial flows to poorer countries as a result of the danger of ex post challenges to lenders'claims, but also of moral hazard and lack of project ownership. This paper presents a discussion of the extant legal and financial environment facing developing country sovereign borrowers and develops a proposed approach within this environment to address issues of concern underlying the concept of odious or illegitimate debt. The authors make the case for focusing attention on codes of conduct along the lines of the Equator Principles and on refining forward-looking attempts to increase aid effectiveness and recover stolen assets.Debt Markets,Bankruptcy and Resolution of Financial Distress,,Access to Finance,External Debt

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2008). A Convenient Untruth: Fact and Fantasy in the Doctrine of Odious Debts,
  2. (2006). A Law-and-Economics Analysis of Odious Debts: History, Trends and Debates,
  3. (2003). Advancing the Odious Debt Doctrine, Centre for International Sustainable Development Law (CISDL) working paper,
  4. (2000). Criminal Debt in the Indonesian Context,
  5. (2006). Defining “Illegitimate Debt”: When Creditors should be Liable for Improper Loans,
  6. (2008). From Odious Debt to Odious Finance: Avoiding the Externalities of a Functional Odious Debt Doctrine,
  7. (1938). Germany’s Responsibility for Austria’s Debts,
  8. (2004). Il debito estero dei paesi in via di sviluppo nel diritto internazionale,
  9. Illegitimacy of odious and dubious debt,
  10. (2005). International Law and State Succession: A Solution to the Iraqi Debt Crisis?,
  11. (2004). Iraq’s Odious Debts,
  12. (2007). Is There a Recognized Legal Doctrine of Odious Debts?, The North Carolina
  13. (2004). La Doctrine de la Dette « Odieuse » ou : L’utilisation du Droit International dans les Rapports de Puissance,
  14. (1986). Le droit international de la succession d’états,
  15. (1984). Legal Problems of the Overindebtedness of Developing Countries:
  16. (1927). Les Effets des Transformations des États sur leurs dettes publìque et autres obligations financières,
  17. (2006). Markets and Government Failures, and Globalization: Perspectives on Debt and Finance,
  18. (2002). Odious Debt,
  19. (2007). Odious Debt: The Terms of the Debate, The North Carolina
  20. (2005). Odious Debts vs. Debt Trap: A Realistic Help?,
  21. (1991). Odious Debts: Loose Lending, Corruption and the Third World’s Environmental Legacy,
  22. (2004). Odious or Just Malodorous? Why the odious debt proposal is likely to stay in cold storage, Finance and Development,
  23. (2003). Odious rulers, odious debts, The Atlantic Monthly,
  24. (1931). Public Debts and State Succession,
  25. (2008). Reflections on A Convenient Untruth,
  26. (2004). Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God: Resurrecting the Odious Debt Doctrine in International Law,
  27. (1995). State Responsibility for Debts – International Law Aspects of External Debt and Debt Restructuring,
  28. (1967). State Succession
  29. (1977). Succession of States in Respect of Matters Other Than Treaties (Report),
  30. Tamara, The Criticism of the Third-World Debt and the Revision of Legal Doctrine,
  31. (2007). The Concept of Odious Debt
  32. (2007). The Dilemma of Odious Debts,
  33. (1932). The Juridical Nature of the Public Debts of States,
  34. (2006). The Legal Case for Debt Repudiation,
  35. (1991). The Succession of States in Respect to Treaties, State Property, Archives, and Debts,
  36. (1982). Through a Glass Darkly: Reflections Upon
  37. (2007). Towards a Solution to Odious Debts and Looking at Creditors’ Incentives,
  38. (2007). Unconstitutional Regimes and the Validity of Sovereign Debt. A Legal Perspective,
  39. (2005). What Iraq and Argentina Might Learn from Each Other,
  40. (2007). Wolfowitz, the World Bank, and Illegitimate Lending,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.