Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Beware of the wolf: Is animal fear affecting willingness to pay for conservation of large carnivores?

By Runar Brännlund, Maria Johansson, Jens Karlsson and Magnus Sjöström


From an interdisciplinary approach, this study aims at analysing self-reported animal fear, specifically large carnivore fear, in relation to public willingness to financially contribute to fulfil a governmental policy on large carnivore-induced costs. In a survey of 2 455 Swedes, it was found that people whose animal fear was directed particularly towards large carnivores, were less likely to be willing to pay (WTP), or were likely to be willing to pay a lower amount of money. In the prediction of WTP, the contribution of the fear variables was equally important as the socio-economic factors. From a management point of view it seems urgent to understand what kinds of measures that may reduce human fear of large carnivores. It is also suggested that further studies should include standardised measures of anxiety and fear in order to be able to closer link the results of large carnivore fear to the psychological literature on human fears.Carnivores; willingness-to-pay

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1998). A crosscultural study of animal fears.
  2. (2008). An alternative interpretation of multiple bounded WTP data – Certainty dependent payment card intervals.
  3. (2006). Cognitive vulnerability: A model of the etiology of fear.
  4. (2008). Contingent values as implicit contracts – estimating minimum legal willingness to pay for wild carnivores in Sweden.
  5. (2006). Cross-cultural assessment of emotional states and personality traits.
  6. (2003). Differential aversive outcome expectancies for high- and low-predation fear relevant animals.
  7. (2008). Direct use values and passive use values: implications for conservation of large carnivores.
  8. (1994). Disease-avoidance model: factor analysis of common animal fears.
  9. (1992). Disgust sensitivity and fear of animals: Effect of exposure to violent or repulsive material.
  10. (1993). Econometric Analysis.
  11. (2007). Human attitudes towards wolf conservation, a matter of distance.
  12. (1993). Human Dimension s of Wildlife,
  13. (1996). Japanese attitudes towards wolves and its recovery.
  14. (2006). Järvens status och ekologi i Sverige. [Status and ecology of wolverines in Sweden]. Report to the Swedish government committee on large carnivore management.
  15. (2006). Living with problem animalsself reported fear of potentially dangerous species in the Sergengeti Region Tanzania.
  16. (2008). Local identity, science and politics invisible.
  17. (2005). Lodjursstammen i Sverige 1994-2004. En utvärdering av inventeringsresultat och metodik. [The lynx population in Sweden 1994-2004. An evaluation of results and census methods]. Grimsö: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
  18. (2003). Patterns of self-reported fear towards large carnivores among the Norweigan public.
  19. (1989). Personality. Theory and Research.
  20. (2000). Phobic dimensions: IV. The structure of animal fears.
  21. (2006). Results from the genetic analyses performed on feces samples from bears in Västerbotten County, Sweden. Part II Population estimate. Report 2006-3 from the Scandinavian brown bear project. Ås: Norweigan University of Life Sciences.
  22. Rovvilt og sauenæring i Norge [Carnivores and sheep farming in Norway]. Report nr 5. Trondheim: Norweigan Institute for Nature Research.
  23. (1994). Self-reported fears to common indigenous animals in an adult UK population: The role of disgust sensivity.
  24. (1999). Svenskarnas inställning till varg – en intervjuundersökning [Swedes attitudes towards wolf – an interview study]. Report 4933. Stockholm: The Swedish Environmental Protection Agency.
  25. (1998). The hierarchic structure of fears.
  26. (2004). The phobic stimuli response scales: a new selfreport measure of fear.
  27. (1997). The roles of gender, sex role, and disgust in fear of animals.
  28. (2003). The structure of feared situations in a nationally representative sample.
  29. (2008). The value of preserving the four large predators in Sweden: Regional differences considered.
  30. (2005). The Wolf in Scandinavia: status report of the 2001-2002 winter. Report 2. Hedmark:
  31. (2006). Tools for the edge: Whats new for conserving carnivores?
  32. (1999). Valuing the wolf in Sweden: Are benefits contingent on the supply? In
  33. (2008). Wolves as a symbol for people’s willingness to pay for large carnivore conservation,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.