Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Issues before the thirteenth finance commission.

By M. Govinda Rao, Tapas Kumar Sen and Pratap R. Jena


The Thirteenth Finance Commission faces challenging times. Despite improvement, the fiscal situation continues to be a matter of concern when off budget liabilities and other fiscal risks are considered. In the changing situation of increasing oil prices on the one hand and surge in capital flows on the other, calibrating the transfer system in tune with counter-cyclical fiscal policy stance is a formidable challenge. The paper argues that irrespective of the wording of the Terms of Reference (ToR), the Commission would do well to focus on its primary task of recommending transfers to serve the objective of equity and incentives. While it is required to take into account a number of considerations, the focus should be on the transfer system. As an impartial body, the Commission should make a fair assessment of the union as well as state governments, ignoring the asymmetries in the wording of the ToR. As regards the transfer system itself is concerned, the paper argues that although it may be difficult to make drastic changes in the relative shares of the states, the Commission should give up the gap filling approach. Instead, after recommending the tax devolution, the Commission should recommend grants to fully equalise expenditures on elementary education and basic healthcare. It is also possible to incentivise the transfer system for even those states that have a better record of providing education and healthcare to improve quality of these services. If necessary, the tax devolution percentage can be appropriately adjusted to ensure equalisation of social services. The paper is a revised and edited version of one that was presented in the seminar on Issues before the Thirteenth Finance Commission held at the National Institute of Public Finance and Policy (NIPFP) on May 23-24, 2008.

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1993). 5 The Ninth Finance Commission sought the opinions of
  2. (2008). Economic Outlook for 2008/09, Economic Advisory Council to the Prime Minister,
  3. (2008). Goods and Services Tax For India, Paper Presented at the Fifth Meeting of the Asian Tax Forum,
  4. Govinda 1997. “Invisible Transfers in Indian Federalism,
  5. (2006). Guhan in a lighter vein used to say that the Finance Commissions can only bark at the centre, but they bite the states! 8 For details on this see, Rao and Rao
  6. (2007). Macroeconomic Management of the Indian Economy: Capital Flows, Interest Rates and Inflation”, Working Paper No.2/2007,
  7. (1986). On Measuring Fiscal Centralization and Fiscal Balance
  8. (2005). Political Economy of Federalism in India. New Delhi:
  9. (1969). Report of the Finance Commission (Fifth),
  10. (1965). Report of the Finance Commission (Fourth),
  11. (2008). Resource Endowment, Fiscal Flows and Regional Equity in Indian Federalism”
  12. (1987). Terms of Reference of the Ninth Finance Commission: Some Preliminary Comments”, Economic and Political Weekly,
  13. (1989). The First Report of the Ninth Finance Commission,
  14. (1993). The Ninth Finance Commission: Issues and Recommendations.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.