Article thumbnail

The Stability of Self Assessed Health Status

By Thomas F. Crossley and Steven Kennedy

Abstract

The use of self assessed health status as a measure of health is common in empirical research. We analyse a unique Australian survey in which a random sub-sample of respondents answer a standard self assessed health question twice -- before and after an additional set of health related questions. 28% of respondents change their reported health status. Response instability is related to age, income and occupation. We also compare the responses of these individuals to other respondents who are queried only once. The distributions of responses to both questions by the former group are statistically different from the distribution of responses by the latter group.self-assessed health status

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales.
  2. (1999). A note on validating Wagstaff and van Dooslair’s health measure in the analysis of inequality in health.
  3. (1998). Aging and inequality in income and health.
  4. (1996). Asking sensitive questions the impact of data collection mode, question format, and question context.
  5. (1997). Does it matter whom and how you ask? Inter and intra-rater agreement in the Ontario health survey.
  6. (1984). Health and subjective well-being: a meta-analysis.
  7. (1999). Health bodies and thick wallets: the dual relation between health and economic status.
  8. (1989). Health perceptions of primary care patients and the influence on health care utilisation.
  9. (1998). Income distribution, socioeconomic status, and self rated health in the United States: multilevel analysis.
  10. (1996). Income, health and happiness.
  11. (1996). New evidence on the relationship between income and health.
  12. (1998). Rational choice and the framing of decisions in:
  13. (1994). Self-rated health and survival: a 7-year follow-up study of Australian elderly.
  14. (1993). SF-36 Health Survey Manual and Interpretation Guide. The Health Institute,
  15. (1996). The impact of employment and hours of work on health status and health service use. National Centre for Social and Economic Modelling Discussion Paper
  16. (1968). Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scales disagreement or partial credit.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.