Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Analyzing trade opening in Ukraine: Effects of a customs union with the EU

By Oksana Harbuzyuk and Stefan Lutz


This paper analyzes the possible a customs union between and the European Union. The GTAP multi-country simulation model of Purdue University's Center for Global Trade Analysis is applied. The welfare measure evaluated is the change in equivalent variation (EV). As all incomes in the model accrue to a representative household, EV fully assesses possible welfare benefits for Ukraine from a bilateral tariff elimination on trade with the EU. As the model includes Ukraine in the aggregated „Former Soviet Union“ region (FSU), EV is estimated for the FSU and then disaggregated on the industry level proportionally to trade shares. The results of our simulations suggest that Ukraine’s EV is particularly sensitive to the inclusion of the agricultural sector into a customs union. Due to the highly protected nature of this sector within the EU, Ukraine would be better off if agriculture were excluded from liberalization. If this scenario is assumed, Ukraine's monetary gain would be in the order of $40 million. --Ukraine,Trade,Integration,GTAP

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2001). Business Central Europe. Accessed at:
  2. (1994). Co-operation Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States,
  3. (2001). Customs Union With the EU: GTAP Analysis For Ukraine,” Master’s Thesis,
  4. (1997). data is used to calculate percentage structure of Ukrainian exports and imports. The original data and calculations are presented in Table C2.
  5. (2000). Deutsch-Französisches Wirtschaftspolitisches Forum B04-01 The Determination of Unemployment Benefits Rafael
  6. (1975). Development of the Extended Linear Expenditure System from Simple Savings Assumptions”.
  7. (1998). Directions of Trade Statistics Yearbook.”
  8. (1996). Economic Implications for Turkey of a Customs Union with the European Union”. World Bank Working Paper #
  9. (1997). Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications.
  10. (1999). How Regional Blocks Affect Excluded Countries. The Price Effects of MERCOSUR,” World Bank Working Paper #
  11. Monitoring Country
  12. (1997). Natsionalna ekonomika v hlobalnomu konkurentnomu ceredovyshchi” (In Ukrainian - “The National Economy in a Global Competitive Environment”).
  13. (2001). News service on the channel “1 plus 1”.
  14. (2000). Small Countries and Preferential Trade Agreements: How Severe is the Innocent Bystander Problem?”. CESifo Working Paper #
  15. (1998). Table A1. Exports and imports of FSU countries, millions of US$ Country Exports, fob Imports,
  16. Table A2. The structure of Ukrainian exports and imports, millions of US$ Sector Export, value Export, share Import, value Import, share 1
  17. Table A3. Calculating adjusted trade flows for Ukraine, millions of US$ GTAP, FSU Ukraine, GTAP adjusted Sector Export Import Export Import 1
  18. (1999). The Integration of Transition Economies into the World Trading System”. World Bank Working Paper
  19. (1998). Trade Liberalization and Endogenous Growth in a Small Open Economy : A Quantitative Assessment”. World Bank Working Paper
  20. (1997). Tsigas
  21. (2001). USED FOR CALCULATIONS For disaggregating non-trade allocation effects the weighting coefficients computed from the table below are used. Input data are from the World Bank
  22. (1998). USED FOR CALCULATIONS Two sources of trade data used in this work are IMF
  23. (1982). Wilfried Prewo
  24. (2001). World Bank Development Statistics. Available at:

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.