Location of Repository

Responses to criminal prosecutions for HIV transmission among gay men with HIV in England and Wales

By A. Bourne, C. Dodds and Matthew Weait

Abstract

In England and Wales, criminal prosecutions for recklessly causing serious bodily harm by transmitting HIV have occurred since 2003. Understanding how people respond to the application of criminal law, will help to determine the likely impact of prosecution. As part of a wider qualitative study on unprotected anal intercourse amongst homosexually active men with diagnosed HIV in England and Wales, 42 respondents were asked about their awareness of criminal prosecutions for the sexual transmission of HIV, and how (if at all) they had adapted their sexual behaviour as a result. Findings demonstrate considerable confusion regarding the law and suggest that misunderstandings could lead people with HIV to wrongly believe that how they act, and what they do or do not say, is legitimated by law. Although criminalisation prompted some respondents to take steps to reduce sexual transmission of HIV, others moderated their behaviour in ways likely to have adverse effects, or reported no change. The aim of the criminal justice system is to carry out justice, not to improve public health. The question addressed in this paper is whether desirable public health outcomes may be outweighed by undesirable ones when the criminal law is applied to a population-level epidemic.\ud \ud Description from publisher website at: http://www.rhmjournal.org.uk

Topics: law
Publisher: Elsevier
Year: 2009
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.bbk.ac.uk.oai2:911

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2009). 17. Bray SJ. Criminal prosecutions for HIV exposure: overview and analysis.
  2. (2006). Criminal convictions for HIV transmission: people living with HIV respond. doi
  3. (2009). Criminal prosecution for HIV transmission: a threat to public health. doi
  4. (1991). Criminalizing the sexual transmission of HIV: an international analysis.
  5. (2009). Do criminal laws influence HIV risk behaviour? doi
  6. Effects of the criminalization of HIV transmission in Cuerrier on men reporting unprotected sex with men. doi
  7. (2005). Grevious harm: use of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 for sexual transmission of HIV. London: Sigma Research;
  8. (2009). HIV transmission should be decriminalized: HIV prevention programs depend on it. doi
  9. (2006). HIV transmission, the law and the work of the clinical team: a briefing paper.
  10. HIV-positive persons' awareness and understanding of their state's criminal HIV disclosure law. AIDS & Behaviour. doi
  11. (2007). Intimacy and responsibility: the criminalisation of HIV transmission. doi
  12. (2009). Legislation contagion: the spread of problematic new HIV laws in Western Africa.
  13. Liability for reckless infection: part 1.
  14. Liability for reckless infection: part 2.
  15. (2009). London: Terrence Higgins Trust;
  16. Naming names: perceptions of name-based HIV reporting, partner notification, and criminalization of nondisclosure among persons living with HIV. doi
  17. Offences Against the Person Act 1861, sections 18 and 20. doi
  18. Policing transmission: a review of police handling of criminal investigations relating to transmission of HIV in England and Wales,
  19. (2006). Prosecution for reckless HIV transmission in England ends with not guilty verdict.
  20. (2008). Prosecution Service. Policy for prosecuting cases involving the intentional or reckless sexual transmission of infection.
  21. (2002). Public Health and HIV Transmission: a policy options paper.
  22. R v Dica [2004] 2 doi
  23. R v Konzani [2005] 2 Cr.
  24. (2009). Reckless HIV transmission case dismissed due to insufficient evidence.
  25. (2009). Relative safety II: risk and unprotected anal intercourse among gay men with diagnosed HIV. doi
  26. (2009). Résumé En Angleterre et au Pays de Gal les , la transmission du VIH fait l'objet de poursuites péna les pour dommages corpore l s par imprudence depu i s
  27. (2009). Sexually charged: the views of gay and bisexual men on criminal prosecutions for sexual HIV transmission. London: Sigma Research;
  28. The criminal for an unam of the use o regulate the those with a Social Scien Network 200 com/abstrac Accessed 31 7. Pearshouse R contagion: t problematic Western Afr Policy & Law 12(2-3):5–11 aidslaw.ca/p interfaces/do ref=1275>.
  29. The criminalisation of HIV transmission. doi
  30. (2008). The optimal penalty for sexually transmitting HIV. Emory Law and Economics Research Paper No.08-29. doi
  31. tion of HIV: time uous rejection iminal law to ual behaviour of at risk of HIV. esearch At: 189501>. gust 2009. egislation spread of HIV laws in HIV/AIDS eview 2008; t: ications/ loadFile.php? essed . alisation of HIV transmission: policy brief.
  32. (2006). Warrant out for missing man who passed on HIV. The Times.
  33. (2006). World Health Organization. WHO technical consultation in collaboration with the European AIDS Treatment Group and AIDs Action Europe on the criminalization of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections.
  34. (2003). Yale University Center for Interdisciplinary Research on AIDS;

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.