Location of Repository

Intra-organizational integration and innovation: organizational structure, environmental contingency and R&D performance

By You-Na Lee and John P. Walsh

Abstract

It is widely thought that intra-firm integration has a positive effect on organizational performance, especially in environments characterized by complex and uncertain information. However, counter arguments suggest that integration may limit flexibility and thereby reduce performance in the face of uncertainty. Research and development activities of a firm are especially likely to face complex and uncertain information environments. Following prior work in contingency theory, this paper analyzes the effects of intra-organizational integration on manufacturing firms’ innovative performance. Based on a survey of R&D units in US manufacturing firms and patent data from the NBER patent database, we examine the relation between mechanisms for linking R&D to other units of the firm and the relative innovativeness of the firm. Furthermore, we argue that the impact of integration may vary by the importance of secrecy in protecting firms’ innovation advantages. We find that intra-firm integration is associated with higher self-reported innovativeness and more patents. We also find some evidence that this effect is moderated by the appropriability regime the firm faces, with the benefits of cross-functional integration being weaker in industries where secrecy is especially important. These results both support and develop the contingency model of organizational performance.Innovation; Organizations; Contingency theory;

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2010). 6. A man with muffin secrets, but no job with them.
  2. (1997). A causal model of the impact of skills, synergy, and design sensitivity on new product performance.
  3. (1970). A formal theory of differentiation in organizations.
  4. (2009). A spatial ecology of structural holes: scientists and communication at a biotechnology firm,
  5. (1985). Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory.
  6. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change.
  7. (1990). Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms.
  8. (2005). Democratizing innovation.
  9. (2008). Designing and facilitating collaboration in R&D: A case study.
  10. (1976). Determinants of coordination modes within organizations.
  11. (1967). Differentiation and integration in complex organizations.
  12. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. Free Pr.
  13. (1984). Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R & D Relationship,".
  14. (1986). Estimates of the Value of Patent Rights
  15. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance,
  16. (2000). Exploring work system practices for time-based manufacturers: their impact on competitive capabilities.
  17. (1988). Flexible manufacturing organizations: implications for strategy formulation and organization design.
  18. (2006). Increasing complexity and limits of organization in the microlithography industry: implications for science-based industries.
  19. (1970). Industrial organization: behaviour and control.
  20. (1994). Industrial organization: Theory and practice:
  21. (2001). Innovation management in context: environment, organization and performance.
  22. (2007). Innovation survey indicators: What impact on innovation policy. Science Technology and Innovation Indicators in a Changing World: Responding to Policy Needs:
  23. (2007). Innovation surveys and policy: lessons from the CIS. Innovation policy in Europe,
  24. (1994). Integration and dynamic capability: evidence from product development in automobiles and mainframe computers.
  25. (1992). Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms.
  26. (2007). Inventors and invention processes in Europe: Results from the PatVal-EU survey.
  27. (1997). Keeping organizational secrets: protective institutional mechanisms and their costs.
  28. (2007). Knowledge management challenges in new business development: Case study observations.
  29. (2002). Knowledge networks: Explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies.
  30. (2000). Knowledge spillovers and patent citations: Evidence from a survey of inventors.
  31. (1996). Knowledge, strategy and the theory of the firm. Knowledge and strategy:
  32. (2009). Leveraging resistance to change and the skunk works model of innovation.
  33. (1967). Managing differentiation and integration. Organization and Environment.
  34. (1993). Manufacturing flexibility: a strategic perspective.
  35. (2001). Maximizing cross-functional new product teams' innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective.
  36. (2003). On the uneven evolution of human know-how.
  37. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology.
  38. (1972). Organizational structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice.
  39. (1989). Organizations for effective product development: the case of the global automobile industry.
  40. (2002). Organizing and coordinating talk and silence in organizations.
  41. (2001). Organizing Technological Interdependencies: a coordination perspective on the firm.
  42. (2010). Patent citations as indicators of knowledge flows from public research. Schumpeter conference
  43. (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicators.
  44. (1986). Patents as options: Some estimates of the value of holding European patent stocks." In:
  45. (1962). Personal Knowledge. Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy
  46. (1976). Perspectives on technology. Cambridge Univ Pr.
  47. (1987). Product development in the world auto industry: strategy, organization and performance.
  48. (1995). Product-process development integration in manufacturing.
  49. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy.
  50. (2000). Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why US manufacturing firms patent (or not)." In: National Bureau of Economic Research
  51. (2002). R&D spillovers, patents and the incentives to innovate in Japan and the United States.
  52. (1999). R&D-Production integration in the early phases of new product development projects.
  53. (2002). Skunkworks approach to project management.
  54. (2002). Sources of capabilities, integration and technology commercialization.
  55. (2010). Structure, learning, and the speed of innovating: a two-phase model of collective innovation using agent based modeling.
  56. (1988). Taking charge of manufacturing: how companies are combining technological and organizational innovations to compete successfully.
  57. (2009). The complementarity of internal integration and product modularity: An empirical study of their interaction effect on competitive capabilities.
  58. (1998). The concept of ‘Ba’: building a foundation for knowledge creation.
  59. (1961). The management of innovation.
  60. (2001). The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools." In: National Bureau of Economic Research
  61. (1994). The organization of innovation in the United States and Japan: neoclassical and relational contracting.
  62. (2001). The patent paradox revisited: an empirical study of patenting
  63. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative science quarterly
  64. (1994). The Skunk Works' Management Style-It's No Secret.
  65. (1988). The sources of innovation.
  66. (2009). The use of limited dependent variable techniques in strategy research: issues and methods.
  67. (1981). Toward a new contingency approach: The search for organizational gestalts.
  68. (1993). Towards an integrative framework of performance in product development projects.
  69. (2001). Trade secrets and information sharing.
  70. (1999). What is behind the recent surge in patenting?
  71. (1973). What the Practitioner Should Know about Trade Secrets and Employment Agreements.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.