Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

The Dynamics of Energy-Grain Prices with Open Interest

By Shawkat Hammoudeh, Soodabeh Sarafrazi, Chia-Lin Chang and Michael McAleer

Abstract

This paper examines the short- and long-run daily relationships for a grain-energy nexus that includes the prices of corn, crude oil, ethanol, gasoline, soybeans, and sugar, and their open interest. The empirical results demonstrate the presence of these relationships in this nexus, and underscore the importance of ethanol and soybeans in all these relationships. In particular, ethanol and be considered as a catalyst in this nexus because of its significance as a loading factor, a long-run error corrector and a short-run adjuster. Ethanol leads all commodities in the price discovery process in the long run. The negative cross-price open interest effects suggest that there is a money outflow from all commodities in response to increases in open interest positions in the corn futures markets, indicating that active arbitrage activity takes place in those markets. On the other hand, an increase in the soybean open interest contributes to fund inflows in the corn futures market and the other futures markets, leading to more speculative activities in these markets. In connection with open interest, the ethanol market fails because of its thin market. Finally, it is interesting to note that the long-run equilibrium (cointegrating relationship), speeds of adjustment and open interest across markets have strengthened significantly during the 2009-2011 economic recovery period, compared with the full and 2007-2009 Great Recession periods.Energy-grain price nexus;open interest;futures prices;crude oil;gasoline;corn;soybean;suger;arbitrage;speculation.

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2008). Bayesian estimation and selection of nonlinear vector error correction models: The case of the sugar-ethanol-oil nexus in Brazil”.
  2. (2008). Bottlenecks, drought, and oil price spikes: Impact on U.S ethanol and agricultural sectors.”
  3. (2003). Cash ethanol cross-hedging opportunities.”
  4. (2002). Efficiency test of agricultural commodity futures markets in China.” Washington State University.
  5. (2010). Ethanol futures: Thin but effective?
  6. (2009). Inventory and transformation hedging effectiveness in corn crushing.”
  7. (1990). Maximum likelihood estimation and inferences on cointegration-with application to demand for money.”
  8. (2010). On the (de)stabilization effects of biofuels: Relative contributions of policy instruments and market forces.”
  9. (2010). Placing the 2006/08 commodity price boom into perspective.” Policy Research Working Paper 5371, World Bank.
  10. (2003). Price discovery in the futures and cash market for sugar.” Paper presented at the Southern Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting,
  11. (2005). Price discovery in the world sugar futures and cash markets: Implications for the Dominican Republic.” Staff Paper # 469,
  12. (1982). Price movements and price discovery in futures and cash markets.”
  13. (1998). Rethinking the soybeans-to-corn price ratio. Is it still a good indicator for planting decisions?” Economic Research Service, US Department of Agriculture,
  14. (1988). Statistical analysis of cointegrating vectors.”
  15. (2008). The US ethanol and biofuels boom: Its origin, current status and future prospect.”

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.