Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Japan: Shadow WTO Agricultural Domestic Support Notifications

By Yoshihisa Godo and Daisuke Takahashi

Abstract

"The purpose of this paper is to provide a comprehensive review of Japan's agricultural domestic policy since 1995 in the context of the current international negotiations in the WTO Doha Round, which has as one aim further reductions of trade-distorting support among member countries. An overwhelming majority of farmers in Japan own small plots of rice paddy fields and earn their living mainly on their off-farm income. They go out into rice paddy fields in their spare time as a subsidiary business. Traditional small farming communities are powerful voting groups that seek to maintain their political power. By exerting political pressures on the authorities, farmers can obtain large returns through the manipulation of farmland use regulations, even though such manipulation causes social harm by preventing efficient land use. These inefficiencies in land use are a major reason why Japan is the only country whose food self-sufficiency rate keeps declining in spite of its heavy agricultural protection. In this sense, Japan is in sharp contrast to European and North American countries, where heavy agricultural domestic supports have resulted in an increased output of agricultural commodities and subsequent distortions in international markets. Apparently, Japan's attitude towards agricultural domestic policy reform is one of compliance with the WTO, which requests member countries to reduce their Aggregate Measure of Support (AMS) through trimming trade-distorting (amber box) support and/or transforming traditional-type agricultural subsidies to decoupled-type ones. Japan reduced its amber box support by nearly 80 percent between 1995 and 2000. This drastic reduction is mainly attributable to Japan's removal of rice from the amber box in 1998. In addition, following the WTO's principle of decoupling, Japan launched an extensive agricultural subsidy reform in 2007. This paper, however, shows the ironical realities of Japanese agricultural policy. Neither a sharp reduction of amber box support nor Japan's 2007 reform necessarily mean there will be a reduction of trade-distorting effects. On the contrary, the 2007 reform may in fact stimulate domestic rice production. In 2007, Japan's AMS is as little as 18 percent of its commitment level from the Uruguay Round WTO agreements. In addition, this paper projects that Japan's overall trade-distorting support (OTDS) for 2013 will be 469 billion yen, which is much less than the limit of 1,635 billion yen that is proposed in the modalities under discussion in July 2008 for the WTO Doha Round. Thus, the WTO Doha Round negotiations on domestic support policy are unlikely to restrict Japan's domestic agricultural support policy." from authors' abstractJapan's agricultural support, WTO Doha Round, WTO compliance, Notification of domestic support, trade,

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2007). Should the Green Box be Modified? Discussion Paper. Washington DC: International Food and Agricultural Trade Policy Council. Godo, Yoshihisa,
  2. (2008). Shadow WTO agricultural domestic support notifications. David Blandford and David Orden,
  3. (2008). Information flow and acquisition of knowledge in water governance in the Upper East Region of Ghana. Eva Schiffer,
  4. (2008). Supply of pigeonpea genetic resources in local markets of
  5. (2008). Persistent poverty and welfare programs in the United States.
  6. (2008). selection, and HIV infection: Evidence from Malawi. Futoshi Yamauchi and Mika Ueyama,
  7. (2008). Evaluating the impact of social networks in rural innovation systems: An overview. Ira Matuschke,
  8. (2008). Migration and technical efficiency in cereal production: Evidence from Burkina Faso. Fleur
  9. (2008). Improving farm-to-market linkages through contract farming: A case study of smallholder dairying in India. Pratap
  10. (2008). Policy options and their potential effects on Moroccan small farmers and the poor facing increased world food prices: A general equilibrium model analysis.
  11. (2008). WTO agricultural domestic support notifications. Ivar Gaasland, Robert Garcia, and Erling Vårdal,
  12. (2008). Reaching middle-income status in Ghana by 2015: Public expenditures and agricultural growth. Samuel Benin, Tewodaj Mogues, Godsway Cudjoe, and Josee Randriamamonjy,
  13. (2008). Integrating survey and ethnographic methods to evaluate conditional cash transfer programs. Michelle Adato,
  14. (2008). Shadow WTO agricultural domestic support notifications. Tim Josling and Alan Swinbank,
  15. (2008). and farmer suicides in India: Reviewing the evidence. Guillaume
  16. (2008). and public goods provision in Indian village governments. Kiran Gajwani and Xiaobo Zhang,
  17. (2008). Measuring Ethiopian farmers’ vulnerability to climate change across regional states. Temesgen Deressa,
  18. (2008). Determinants of agricultural protection from an international perspective: The role of political institutions. Christian H.C.A. Henning,
  19. (2008). the impact of climate change in South Africa’s Limpopo River Basin. Sharon Shewmake,
  20. (2008). and growth: A computable general equilibrium analysis of Mozambique. Channing Arndt,
  21. (2008). Agricultural exit problems: Causes and consequences. Derek Headey, Dirk Bezemer,
  22. (2008). Cotton-textile-apparel sectors of India: Situations and challenges
  23. (2008). Cotton-textile-apparel sectors of Pakistan: Situations and challenges
  24. (2008). Race to the top and race to the bottom: Tax competition in rural China. Yi Yao and Xiaobo Zhang,
  25. (2008). Analyzing the determinants of farmers’ choice of adaptation methods and perceptions of climate change in the Nile Basin of Ethiopia. Temesgen Deressa,
  26. Economic transformation in theory and practice: What are the messages for Africa? Clemens Breisinger and Xinshen Diao,
  27. (2008). Biosafety at the crossroads: An analysis of South Africa’s marketing and trade policies for genetically modified products. Guillaume P. Gruère and Debdatta Sengupta,
  28. (2008). patent? Knowledge dissemination in agricultural biotechnology. An Michiels and Bonwoo Koo,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.