Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Corruption, Fertility, and Human Capital

By Panagiotis Arsenis and Dimitrios Varvarigos

Abstract

We build an overlapping generations model in which reproductive households face a child quantity/child quality trade-off and bureaucrats are delegated with the task of delivering public services that support the accumulation of human capital. By integrating the theoretical analyses of endogenous growth, corruption and fertility choices, we offer a novel mechanism on the driving forces behind demographic transition. In particular, we attribute it to the endogenous change in the incidence of bureaucratic corruption that occurs at different stages of an economy?s transition towards higher economic development.Corruption; Demographic transition; Human capital; Economic growth

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2003). A stochastic model of mortality, fertility, and human capital investment”,
  2. (1999). Bureaucratic corruption and endogenous economic growth”,
  3. (2005). Cheap children and the persistence of poverty”,
  4. (2002). Child labour, fertility and economic growth”,
  5. (2009). Chronic disease burden and the interaction of education, fertility, and growth”,
  6. (1995). Corruption and growth”,
  7. (2008). Corruption, development, and demography”,
  8. (2002). Corruption, economic growth, and income inequality in Africa”,
  9. (2005). Corruption, inequality, and fairness”,
  10. (2009). Corruption, institutions and economic development”,
  11. (2011). Democracy, rule of law, corruption incentives, and growth”,
  12. (1964). Economic development through bureaucratic corruption”,
  13. (2010). Education versus fertility: evidence from before the demographic transition”,
  14. (2009). Education, corruption and the distribution of income”,
  15. (2000). Endogenous corruption in a neoclassical growth model”,
  16. (2003). Inequality and growth: why differential fertility matters?”,
  17. (2005). Mortality reductions, educational attainment, and fertility choice”,
  18. (2010). Natural resources, democracy, and corruption”,
  19. (2005). Public expenditures, bureaucratic corruption and economic development”, Centre for Growth and Business Cycle Research discussion paper no. 53,
  20. (1980). Testing the quantity-quality model: the use of twins as a natural experiment”,
  21. (2006). The incidence and persistence of corruption in economic development”,
  22. (2005). The more the merrier? The effect of family composition on children‟s education”,
  23. (1992). The trade-off between child quantity and quality”,
  24. (2009). The transition of corruption: from poverty to honesty”,
  25. (1997). Why don‟t poor countries catch up? A cross national test of an institutional explanation”,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.