Article thumbnail

Good Predictions and Bad Policies

By Luis Roberto Martínez Armas


Relatively little has been said on economic policy by participants in the debate on the realisticness of assumptions in economic models. What has been said is that a `Friedmanian´ methodology which accepts unrealistic assumptions and is only concerned with correct predictions is appropriate from the perspective of a practical economist who is in charge of designing policy. This paper tries to show that this is not true. Even if a model provides very accurate predictions of an event, its ability to provide valid explanations is determined by the realisticness of its underlying assumptions. Different assumptions yield different explanations and unrealistic assumptions tend to provide no explanation at all. There is a strong relation between the way a phenomenon is explained and understood and the actions that are consequently recommended. Therefore, a model based on unrealistic assumptions is not a reliable source of advice on policy.Milton Friedman, unrealistic assumptions, economic policy, economic models, instrumentalism.

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1994). [1953]). The Methodology of Positive Economics.
  2. (1994). [1983]). The Rhetoric of Economics. In
  3. (1979). A Critique of Friedman's Critics.
  4. (1983). An Essay on the Foundations of Friedman's Methodology.
  5. (2001). Ceteris Paribus Laws and Socio - Economic Machines.
  6. (2002). Credible Worlds: The Status of Theoretical Models in Economics.
  7. (2003). Did Milton Friedman's Methodology License the Formalist Revolution?
  8. (2008). How I Work. Retrieved
  9. (1962). Irrational Behavior and Economic Theory.
  10. (1981). John Stuart Mill's Philosophy of Economics.
  11. (2000). Kinds of Assumptions and their Truth: Shaking an Untwisted F-Twist.
  12. (1994). Knowledge and Persuasion in Economics. Cambridge:
  13. (2000). Methodology Now!
  14. (2006). Model Selection and Multiple Research Goals: The Case of Ratioanl Addiction.
  15. (2005). Models are Experiments, Experiments are Models.
  16. (1994). On Econometric Tools. In
  17. (2009). Reading the methodological essay in twentieth century economics: map of multiple perspectives.
  18. (2008). Realistic Realism about Unrealistic Models. Working Paper .
  19. (2001). Reflection without Rules: Economic Methodology and Contemporary Science Theory. Cambridge:
  20. (1994). Reorienting the Assumptions Issue. In
  21. (2002). Some Nonreasons for Nonrealism about Economics. In
  22. (1992). The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics. Cambridge:
  23. (1999). The Methodology of Economics and the Survival Principle Revisited and Revised: Some Welfare and Public Policy Implications of Modeling the Economic Agent. Review of Social Economy ,
  24. (1992). The Methodology of Economics: How Economists Explain. Cambridge:
  25. (1971). Theoretical Assumptions and non - observed Facts.
  26. (2001). Two Responses to the Failings of Modern Economics: The Instrumentalist and the Realist. Review of Population and Social Policy ,
  27. (2002). Ugly Currents in Modern Economics. In
  28. (2005). Unobservability, Tractability and the Battle of Assumptions.
  29. (1981). Unreal Assumptions' in Economic Theory: The F-Twist Untwisted.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.