Article thumbnail

Climate policy induced investments in developing countries: the implications of investment risks

By Christoph Böhringer and Andreas Löschel


International climate policy has assigned the leading role in emissions abatement to the industrialized countries while developing countries remain uncommitted to binding emission reduction targets. However, cooperation between the industrialized and the developing world through joint implementation of emission abatement promises substantial economic gains to both parties. In this context, the policy debate on joint implementation has addressed the question of how investment risks to project-based emission crediting between industrialized countries and developing countries affect the magnitude and distribution of such gains. In our quantitative analysis, we find that the incorporation of country-specific investment risks induces rather small changes vis-?-vis a situation where investment risks are neglected. Only if investors go for high safety of returns is there a distinct decline in the overall volume of emission crediting and the associated total economic benefits. While the welfare effects of risk incorporation for industrialized countries are unequivocally negative, the implications across developing countries are ambiguous. Whereas low-risk developing countries attract higher project volumes and benefit from higher effective prices per emission credit compared to a reference scenario without risk, the opposite applies to high-risk countries. Sensitivity analysis with respect to higher risk estimates show that shifts in the comparative advantage of emission abatement against high-risk countries may become dramatic as only very low-cost mitigation projects will be realized, driving down the country?s benefits from emission crediting to the advantage of low-risk developing countries. This result is supported by empirical evidence on regional imbalances of activities implemented jointly under the pilot phase of the Kyoto Protocol. --international climate policy,investment risks

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1984). A Survey of the Quantitative Approaches to Country Risk Analysis’,
  2. (1963). An Expected Gain-Confidence Limit Criterion For Portfolio Selection’,
  3. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Risk-Bearing, Helsinki: Yrjoe Jahnssonin Saatio.
  4. (2001). Bank Capital Regulation in Contemporary Banking Theory: A Review of the Literature’, Financial Markets,
  5. (1996). Climate Change 1995: Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change, Contribution of Working Group III to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge:
  6. (2002). Climate Politics From Kyoto to Bonn: From Little to Nothing?’, in:
  7. (1989). Economic Decisions under Uncertainty,2 .e d . ,H e i d e l b e r g :P h y s i c a -Verlag.
  8. (2002). Economic Implications of Using a Mean-VaR Model for Portfolio Selection: A Comparison with Mean-Variance Analysis’,
  9. (1999). Environmental policy and Transactions Costs’,
  10. (1999). Estimating Country Premiums’, NYU Working Paper,N e wY o r k :
  11. (2000). Eyre,G .J o n e s ,P .S a n d s ,M .S t u a r ta n dF .Y a m i n
  12. (2000). Implementing the Kyoto Mechanisms: Potential Contributions by Banks and Insurance Companies’,
  13. (1999). Infrastructure Project Finance and Capital Flows: A New Perspective’, Economic Development Institute Working Paper,
  14. (1999). International Rules for Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading: Defining the Principles, Modalities, Rules and Guidelines for Verification, Reporting and Accountability,
  15. (1998). Joint Implementation: Strategic Reactions and Possible Remedies’,
  16. (1997). Marketable Pollution Permits with Uncertainty and Transaction Costs’,
  17. (2001). Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
  18. (1952). Portfolio Selection’,
  19. (2002). Risk Management of Joint Implementation and Clean Development Mechanism Projects through Carbon Investment Funds’,
  20. (1955). Safety First and Hedging’,
  21. (1999). The Costs of the Kyoto Protocol: A Multi-Model Evaluation’,
  22. (1999). The Kyoto Protocol: A Guide and Assessment, London: Royal Institute of International Affairs.
  23. (1986). The Pricing of Bonds and Bank Loans
  24. (2001). Towards a Private-Public Synergy in Financing Climate Change Mitigation Projects’,
  25. (1995). Transaction Costs and Tradable Permits’,
  26. (2001). Value at Risk: The New Benchmark for Managing Financial Risk,2 .e d . ,
  27. (2001). Variable Selection for Portfolio Choice’,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.