Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Diplomatic negotiation in an international organisation: an exploration of expert status and power

By Lisa McEntee-Atalianis

Abstract

This paper will explore the status and characteristics of ‘expert’ membership within an international organisation and its influence on the development of ‘exosomatic resources’. Invoking the framework of the ‘Community of Practice’ (Wenger, 1998), it is argued that status and power are realised in the development and interpretation of policy and conventions within the organisation, through the ‘negotiation of meaning’ and through the ‘politics of participation and reification’. Negotiations and decisions may take place over a period of time but are also situated within plenary debates. As such it is argued that power and hierarchy are not fixed structures but are emergent and fluid discursively over time and space. The paper defines the characteristics of ‘expert’ membership encompassing a consideration of the command of participatory and interactional norms, as well as knowledge of the status and content of reified products. To illustrate these characteristics a critical analysis of the discourse of one delegate is provided. This exemplifies how expert knowledge is applied within a debate to influence and inform the development and interpretation of texts and subsequently to contribute to the (re)production of shared meaning and agreement on issues under debate. It is argued that in considering both the forms of asymmetry in organisations and the practice of decision-making, research should focus on: the type of knowledge that is required and valued in any context; how this knowledge is accessed, enacted and exploited; and which members are instrumental in its construction, representation and reproduction

Topics: alc
Publisher: Common Ground Publishing
Year: 2008
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.bbk.ac.uk.oai2:2482

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. African Environmental and Human Development Agency,
  2. (1988). Communication and Power in Organisations: Discourse, Ideology and Domination. doi
  3. (2005). Communities of practice: Legitimacy not choice. doi
  4. (2005). eds, Directions in sociolinguistics: the ethnography of communication. doi
  5. (2005). eds,Directions in sociolinguistics: the ethnography of communication. doi
  6. (2006). Gendered Talk at Work. doi
  7. (2006). Geostrategies of Interlingualism: Language Policy and Practice doi
  8. (1999). Introduction: organizational discourses and practices. doi
  9. (2006). Investigating Workplace Discourse. doi
  10. (1997). Language: The Discourse of Corporate Meetings. doi
  11. (2000). Linguistic Variation as Social Practice: The Linguistic Construction of Identity at Belten High. doi
  12. (1997). Managing Language: The Discourse of Corporate Meetings. doi
  13. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings’, doi
  14. (1992). Talk at Work. Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: doi
  15. (1999). Talk, Work and Institutional Order: doi
  16. (1997). The Languages of Business: An International Perspective. Edinburgh:
  17. (1990). The Structure of Pedagogic Discourse: Class, Codes and Control, doi
  18. (2005). What is the role of power in sociolinguistic variation? doi
  19. (2006). You tell all the stories’: Using narrative to explore hierarchy within a Community of Practice. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.