Location of Repository

Comparative computational analysis of drag-reducing devices for tractor-trailers

By Vihar Malviya, Rakesh Mishra and John D. Fieldhouse

Abstract

Constant rise in fuel price in recent times has caused manufacturers of heavy commercial vehicles (HCV) to turn to efficient aerodynamic design of trucks, wagons, tractors as well as trailers.\ud \ud The comparative analysis in this study compares the coefficient of drag of the following four aerodynamic configurations of a tractor-trailer combination:\ud \ud 1. Semi-trailer with no devices.\ud \ud 2. Semi-trailer with cab roof fairing.\ud \ud 3. Semi-trailer with the proposed rolling pin device.\ud \ud 4. Semi-trailer with the proposed rolling pin device and the cab roof fairing.\ud \ud The overall coefficient of drag for the tractor-trailer combination for the above four configurations is computed and compared along with that of individual critical surfaces to analyse the effect of two major drag-reducing devices, the cab roof fairing and the momentum injection rolling pin. The pressure distribution in the flow field around the vehicle is studied to understand the flow mechanisms involved in the reduction in overall drag

Topics: TL, QA76
Publisher: University of Huddersfield
Year: 2008
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.hud.ac.uk:3669

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2004). Aerodynamic Devices to Reduce the Base- and Underbody Drag of Semitrailer Unit'. In:
  2. (2001). Aerodynamic Forces on Truck Models, Including Two Trucks in Tandem, doi
  3. (2005). Aerodynamic guiding arrangements for vehicles. [online] Available from: [Accessed
  4. (1988). Aerodynamic structure for semi-trailer trucks. [online] Available from: [Accessed
  5. (2006). Cross flow vortex trap device and method for reducing the aerodynamic drag of ground vehicles.
  6. (2008). Diesel prices and fuel tax'.
  7. (2008). Effect of moving surface on the aerodynamic drag of road vehicles'. doi
  8. (2008). Energy density'. Transtronics Home of Automation .
  9. (2006). FLUENT 6.3 User's Guide'. doi
  10. (1999). Fluid dynamics of flat plates and rectangular prisms in the presence of moving surface boundary-layer control'. doi
  11. (2007). GAMBIT 2.4 User's Guide'.
  12. (1997). Moving Surface Boundary-Layer Control: A Review'. doi
  13. (2005). One piece A-pillar air deflector and windshield molding. [online] Available from: [Accessed
  14. (2005). Reducing Aerodynamic Drag and Fuel Consumption'.
  15. (2006). Smoothing the Flow at TNT Express and Somerfield using Truck Aerodynamic Styling'. Freight Best Practice. [online] Available from: [Accessed
  16. (2008). Teardrop Trailer'.
  17. (2008). the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: doi
  18. (2007). Weights and dimensions / vehicle plating - 03/01/2007 -RoadTransport.com'.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.