Location of Repository

Against requirements of rationality

By Anthony W. Price

Abstract

Are inferences, theoretical and practical, subject to requirements of rationality? If so, are these of the form 'if … ought …' or 'ought … if …'? If the latter, how are we to understand the 'if'? It seems that, in all cases, we get unintuitive implications (often involving bootstrapping) if 'ought' connotes having reason. It is difficult to formulate such requirements, and obscure what they explain. There might also be a requirement forbidding self-contradiction (not that one's current beliefs can be consciously contradictory). It is a good question whether self-contradiction constitutes, or evidences, irrationality; but talk of a rational requirement causes trouble

Topics: phil
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell
Year: 2008
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.bbk.ac.uk.oai2:2742

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2001),„Are Intentions Reasons? And How Should We Cope with Incommensurable Values?‟, doi
  2. (2005a), „The Myth of Instrumental Rationality‟, doi
  3. (1959). 32 I am indebted to John Broome for critical comments, and grateful to the Aristotelian Society for a constructive discussion. Revisions after the event were prompted by Dorothy Edgington and
  4. (1959). An Introduction to Wittgenstein’s Tractatus doi
  5. (2008). Contextuality in Practical Reason (Oxford: Clarendon Press), due out in doi
  6. (1997). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (Cambridge: doi
  7. (2005). Have We Reason to Do as Rationality Requires?: A Comment on Raz‟,
  8. How does Coherence Matter?‟, doi
  9. Instrumental Rationality: A Reprise‟, doi
  10. (2005). Is Rationality Normative?‟, in the conference volume of the European Congress of Philosophy,
  11. (1995). Practical Inference‟, in doi
  12. (2007). Structural Irrationality‟,
  13. (1977). The Ethics of Belief‟, doi
  14. (2007). Wide or Narrow Scope?, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.