Location of Repository

The institutionalisation of political risk assessment (IPRA) in Jordanian international firms

By Adel Al Khattab, J.R Anchor and Eleanor M.M. Davies

Abstract

This paper investigates the determinants of the institutionalisation of political risk assessment (IPRA) within publicly traded international firms in Jordan. The aim is to contribute to the development of IPRA theory by identifying indicators of institutionalisation; by describing and explaining their determinants; and by investigating their relative importance. The paper also represents one of the first studies of political risk assessment of firms in a Middle East context.\ud \ud \ud The study focuses on firm-specific characteristics and extends previous research by investigating firms’ size and degree of internationalisation. A survey strategy was adopted and self-administered questionnaires were distributed to the entire target population of Jordanian international firms. 44 usable responses were obtained (54.9%). Non-parametric statistics were used to test the research hypotheses.\ud \ud \ud The main findings are that the level of institutionalisation of political risk assessment (PRA) within firms is significantly and positively correlated with a firm's total assets, international revenue and number of operating countries. Of the three significant determinants of institutionalisation, the number of operating countries is found to be the most important. The more countries in which a firm operates, the more likely it is to face significant risks, and so to institutionalise political risk assessment

Topics: HF, JA, DS
Publisher: Elsevier
Year: 2008
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.hud.ac.uk:3836

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, doi
  2. (1980). Assessing the political environment: an emerging function in international companies.
  3. (2008). Background Note: Jordan, Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs,
  4. (2003). Country risk and stock market volatility, predictability, and diversification in the Middle East and Africa”, doi
  5. (2001). Country risk measures: how risky are they?” doi
  6. (2000). Discovering statistics: using SPSS for Windows.
  7. (2007). Does ownership affect a firm’s performance and default risk in Jordan”, doi
  8. (2000). Driving defensively through a minefield of political risk”, Financial Times,
  9. (2004). Exchange doi
  10. (2005). Expanding the reach of risk management information systems”, Risk and Insurance,
  11. (1997). Firm-level political behaviour in the global marketplace”, doi
  12. (2005). Giving managers the creeps”, Risk and Insurance,
  13. (1992). Importance of political risk assessment functions in U.S. multinational corporations”, doi
  14. (2005). Is political risk company-specific?: the market side of the Yukos affair”, Discussion paper (Centre for Economic Policy Research, doi
  15. (2005). Jordan since 1989: a study in political doi
  16. (2001). Making political risk fit”,
  17. (2001). Management accounting financial strategy. doi
  18. (2006). Managerial concerns of political risk doi
  19. (2006). Managing micropolitical risk: a crosssector examination”, doi
  20. (1982). Managing political risk assessment: strategic response to environmental change. California:
  21. (2004). Measuring political risk : risks to foreign investment.
  22. (2007). Middle East and North Africa markets investment: challenges and market structure”, Networks Financial Institution Working Paper No. doi
  23. (2008). Middle East Monitor: East Med :Jordan,
  24. (1999). Nonparametric statistical methods. 2nd ed. doi
  25. (1992). Political risk analysis around the North Atlantic. doi
  26. (1993). Political risk analysis of U.S firms: a theoretical framework and an empirical analysis”, Multinational Business Review,
  27. (1997). Political risk analysis: a conceptual re-evaluation.
  28. (2002). Political risk and equity investment in developing countries”, doi
  29. (2005). Political risk and the institutional environment for foreign direct investment in Latin America.
  30. (1988). Political risk assessment models and techniques: analysis of the experience of MNCs”, doi
  31. (2000). Political risk assessment: a case study of Turkish companies operating in Central Asian and Russian markets”,
  32. (1996). Political risk assessment: theory and the experience of Dutch firms”, doi
  33. (2004). Political risk exposure and management in multi-national companies: is there a role for the corporate risk manager?”, Risk Management: doi
  34. (1990). Political risk forecasting by Canadian firms”, doi
  35. (2000). Political risk in international business”.
  36. (1988). Political risk management: a portfolio planning model”, doi
  37. (2003). Political risks as firm-specific (dis)advantages: Evidence on transnational oil firms in Nigeria”. doi
  38. (2001). Practical research: planning and design. 7th ed.
  39. (2007). Risk Diversification in Emerging Economics”, doi
  40. (2005). Smaller may be beautiful but is it more risky?: assessing and managing political and economic risk in Costa Rica”, doi
  41. (2003). Strategies for political risk mediation by international firms in transition economies: the case of Bulgaria”, doi
  42. (1993). Strategy and structure: chapters in the history of the industrial enterprise. 2nd ed. doi
  43. (1980). The assessment and evaluation of noneconomic environments by American firms: a preliminary report”, doi
  44. (2004). The challenge of political risk: exploring the political risk management of Swedish multinational corporations.
  45. (1991). The determinants of country risk ratings”, doi
  46. (2002). The explanatory power of political risk in emerging markets”, doi
  47. (1995). The extent of usage of political risk analysis in UK multinational organisations. MPhil thesis, UK:
  48. (2001). The handbook of country and political risk analysis.
  49. (2000). The institutional environment for multinational investment.” doi
  50. (1983). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields”, doi
  51. (1994). The relationship between firm size and export behaviour revisited”, doi
  52. (1992). The rise and fall of political risk assessment”, doi
  53. (1991). The role of global scanning in business planning”, doi
  54. (2005). Threats to international operations: dealing with political risk at the firm level”, doi
  55. (2003). UK executives” vision on business environment for information scanning: a cross industry study’, doi
  56. (2003). Vulnerability and risk: some thoughts from a political and policy perspective”, Risk Analysis, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.