Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Does ‘Ought’ Imply ‘Can’? And\ud Did Kant Think It Does?

By R. Stern

Abstract

The aim of this article is twofold. First, it is argued that while the principle of ‘ought\ud implies can’ is certainly plausible in some form, it is tempting to misconstrue it, and that\ud this has happened in the way it has been taken up in some of the current literature.\ud Second, Kant’s understanding of the principle is considered. Here it is argued that these\ud problematic conceptions put the principle to work in a way that Kant does not, so that\ud there is an important divergence here which can easily be overlooked

Year: 2004
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:298

Suggested articles


To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.