Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

What’s in a name? Alternatives to “learning disability”

By Simon Whitaker and Sheffield The Burton Street Group

Abstract

The term learning disability is currently used in the UK to describe people who require a service due to a low intellectual ability. It is argued that the term is demeaning, confusing and, as currently defined, fails to describe the group of people to whom it is currently applied. It is suggested that a better term for researchers to use would be intellectual disability; however, we should avoid labelling individual services users at all

Topics: BF
Publisher: University of Huddersfield
Year: 2006
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.hud.ac.uk:4286

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2002). Critical Discursive Psychology. doi
  2. (1986). Disparity in mental retarded persons’ IQs derived from different intelligence tests.
  3. (2004). Hidden learning disability. doi
  4. (1987). Massive gains in 14 nations: What IQ tests really measure. doi
  5. (2005). Rejecting the Label. Mental Retardation. doi
  6. (1997). She has different fits to me: how people with learning difficulties see themselves. doi
  7. (2003). Should we abandon the concept of mild learning disability?
  8. (2000). The hidden history of IQ and special education: Can the problem be solved? doi
  9. (1984). The mean IQ of Americans: Massive gains doi
  10. (2004). The Social Construction of Intellectual Disability. Cambridge: doi
  11. (2005). The use of the WISC-III and the WAIS-III with people with a learning disability: Three concerns.
  12. (2001). Valuing People: A New Strategy for Learning Disability for the 21st Century. doi
  13. (1989). Variations in the Wechsler interscale IQ disparities at different levels of IQ. doi
  14. (1998). WAIS-III and WISC-III IQ gains in the United States from 1972 to 1995: How to compensate for obsolete norms. Perceptual and Motor Skills, doi
  15. (1997). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale – Third Edition. doi
  16. (1985). Wechsler intelligence tests: Do we really have a criterion of mental retardation?
  17. (2005). What’s in a Name? doi
  18. (2000). What’s in a name? The implications of diagnosis for people with learning difficulties and their family carers. doi
  19. (1997). Who Decides? Making Decisions on Behalf of Mentally Incapacitated Adults. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.