Location of Repository

Should we abandon the concept of mild learning disability?

By Simon Whitaker

Abstract

It is argued that, as we are not able to measure IQ with sufficient accuracy to assign a large proportion as having an IQ either above or below 70, we should stop using IQ as a criterion for a learning disability service, and therefore abandon the concept of mild learning disability

Topics: BF
Publisher: The British Psychological Society
Year: 2003
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.hud.ac.uk:4292

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (1986). American Association on Mental Deficiency Spitz,
  2. (1992). American Association on Mental Retardation doi
  3. (1993). Conjoint effects of intelligence and adaptive behavior on achievement in a nonreferred sample. doi
  4. (2002). Letter: On the problems in implementing the White Paper: Valuing People.
  5. (1999). Reliability, criterion-related validity and qualitative comments of fourth edition of the StanfordBinet Intelligence Scale with a young adult population with intellectual disabilities. doi
  6. (1990). Self-regulation and mental retardation.
  7. (2000). The hidden history of IQ and special education: Can the problem be solved?
  8. (1998). to 1995: How to compensate for obsolete norms.
  9. (1989). Variations in the Wechsler interscale IQ disparities at different levels of doi
  10. (1985). Wechsler intelligence tests: Do we really have a criterion of mental retardation?

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.