Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

A difficult negotiation: fieldwork relations with gatekeepers

By Carla Reeves


This paper explores the challenges the researcher faced when undertaking ethnographic fieldwork within a Probation Approved Premises. How access to research sites is achieved is increasingly being discussed, particularly in ethnographic accounts. These discussions often focus on the practical and ethical challenges of entering fieldwork sites. In contrast, how researchers leave study populations or sites is rarely explored, although perhaps as complex and sensitive to negotiate as access. \ud \ud This paper reflects upon the practical, ethical and emotional dilemmas experienced by the author when conducting research with sex offenders and staff in a probation hostel. The focus of the paper is on how access was gained and how the site and the people who took part in the research were left at the end of the fieldwork. Key issues include: formal and informal gatekeepers to study sites, participants and forms of data; rapport; attachment to researchers and; deciding when to end fieldwork. Issues of gender are alluded to in this paper, but will not be focussed on as they will be dealt with in detail elsewhere. It is concluded that negotiating access is different to gaining entry to a research site, and that these negotiations include considerations of the relationship between the researcher, the research and the researched

Topics: H1, HM
Publisher: Sage
Year: 2010
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2003). Accessing the Community: Gaining Insider Perspectives From the Outside.’ Qualitative Health Research. doi
  2. (1991). Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. doi
  3. (2005). Bias, Intimacy and Power in Qualitative Fieldwork Strategies.’
  4. (1989). Case Study Research: Design
  5. (2008). Conceptualizing from the Inside: Advantages,
  6. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth Of The Prison. doi
  7. (2004). Doing Collaborative Research: doing what feels right and makes sense.’ doi
  8. (1993). Doing Research on Sensitive Topics. doi
  9. (2003). Editorial’. Criminal Justice Matters. Centre for Crime and Justice Studies. doi
  10. (1995). Ethnography: principles and practice 2nd ed. doi
  11. (1991). Female Researchers in Male-Dominated Settings’ doi
  12. (2002). Getting Beyond the ‘Official Line’: Reflections on Dilemmas of Access, doi
  13. (2000). Getting on the Door and Staying There: A covert participant observational study of bouncers.’
  14. (2003). In The Field: notes on observation in qualitative research.’ doi
  15. (2004). Leaving the Private World of Wives or Professional Athletes: A Male Sociologist’s Reflections.’ doi
  16. (1999). Metropolitan Researchers Undertaking Rural Research: Benefits and Pitfalls.’ doi
  17. (2000). Police Research’. In doi
  18. (2008). Sex Offenders’ Lives Experiences of Institutional Life: A Case Study of A Probation Hostel. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis.
  19. (1997). Surviving Ethnography: Coping with Isolation, Violence and Anger.’ The Qualitative Report.
  20. (1957). Techniques of Neutralization: A Theory of Delinquency’. doi
  21. (2001). The ambiguity of Boundaries in the Fieldwork Experience: Establishing Rapport and Negotiating Insider/Outsider Status.’ Qualitative Inquiry. doi
  22. (2003). The Dual Imperative doi
  23. (2001). The Ethics of Ethnography.’ In doi
  24. (2006). The Field of Work and the Work of the Field: Conceptualizing an doi
  25. (2000). The Insight of Emotional Danger: Research experiences in a home for older people.
  26. (2002). What’s Rapport Got to Do With It? The Practical Accomplishments of Fieldwork Relations Between Young Female Researchers and Socially Marginalised Older Men.’ The Qualitative Report.
  27. (2005). Young Service Users as Co-researchers.’ Qualitative Social Work. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.