Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Identification of E-Procurement Drivers and Barriers for UK Construction Organisations and Ranking of these from the Perspective of Quantity Surveyors

By Robert Eadie, Srinath Perera and George Heaney


SUMMARY: The possibilities afforded by E-business are evident, but the level of implementation and penetration was not as expected within the construction industry. The potential benefits for construction are suggested by the E-business accomplishments in other industries. Yet its poor uptake (less than 20% of documentation is currently tendered electronically) suggests the unpopularity of e-procurement in UK construction. Many drivers and barriers to general e procurement have been identified in published literature. Previous studies in the US (Davila et al, 2003, Minahan and Degan, 2001) and Australia (Hawking et al, 2004) have ranked these drivers and barriers for the general procurement of goods and services. In previous research, Eadie et al (2007) ranked the drivers and barriers to e-procurement from a construction contractor’s perspective in the Northern Ireland public sector in a pilot study for this current research.\ud \ud In the current research, a focus group was established consisting of five domain experts, who represented the various aspects and levels of expertise of construction procurement, namely: web-based materials procurement, e-auctions, compact disc write once (CDR) e-tendering, the contractor’s perspective and electronic document production. This group produced a comprehensive list of construction based e-procurement drivers and barriers. A detailed questionnaire for a web-based survey was produced from the findings of this focus group to ascertain the importance rankings of these drivers and barriers. A telephone survey of all Quantity Surveyors within the United Kingdom, listed on the Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) website, identified those who used e-procurement. This was followed by a web-based questionnaire survey of the identified organisations on e-procurement for construction based activities. This paper presents the findings of the driver and barrier verification study and the driver and barrier importance ranking survey. Further research will link the drivers and barriers to e-procurement to the five maturity levels in Paulk’s maturity model through factor analysis. This research and development will result in the production of a tool to analyse the e-readiness of an organisation, and hopefully this tool will allow them to harness drivers and to mitigate barriers

Topics: G500, K200, K900
Publisher: International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction
Year: 2010
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2003). Aligning corporate strategy, procurement strategy and e-procurement tools, doi
  2. (2006). Blogs making their impact felt, BBC Website (Available on-line at [Assessed December 08] Solomon D.
  3. (1993). Capability Maturity Model for Software, Version 1.1, doi
  4. (2004). CITE Website, (Available online at [Accessed
  5. (1998). Corporate Amnesia Keeping the Know-how in the company,
  6. (2006). Developing a model for the analysis of e-procurement capability maturity of Construction Organisations,
  7. (2008). Development Agency (IDEA)(2004). The Benefits of e-Procurement, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, HMSO, UK, available on-line at [assessed
  8. (2007). Drivers and Barriers to Public Sector e-procurement within Northern Ireland’s Construction Industry, doi
  9. (2004). E-Business in Construction: A model for Successful Implementation,
  10. (2003). E-Procurement and extranets in the UK Construction industry, Conference paper given at FIG Working Week,
  11. (2004). E-Procurement: Is the Ugly Duckling Actually a Swan Down Under?, Asia Pacific doi
  12. (2008). E-Tendering about time too, RICS paper (Available online [accessed
  13. (2006). Efficiency Gains to be Won through the Introduction of Electronic Tendering in the Construction Industry, available on-line at [assessed
  14. (2002). Electronic Business Outlook:E-Markets Realism, not Pessimism, Price Waterhouse Coopers, (Available online [Accessed
  15. (1999). Electronic Contracts : A New Legal Framework for Electronic Contracts: The EU Electronic Commerce Proposal, doi
  16. (1999). Electronic Signatures : Making Electronic Signatures a reality, Computer Law and Security doi
  17. (1999). Fifty Ways Towards A Learning Organisation,
  18. (1996). Gazing into the oracle: The Delphi Method and its application to social policy and public health,
  19. (2008). Government makes Key Cost and Effective Savings with innovative technology, Bravosolution Website, (Available on-line [assessed
  20. (2001). How knowledge can improve e business in construction,
  21. (1983). Human resource development: The theory and practice of need assessment,
  22. (2005). Internal correspondence to Central Procurement Directorate (CPD). Central Procurement Directorate,
  23. (2008). Local e-Gov (2004). Government Targets : e-Procurement Targets for English Local Authorities, available online at [assessed
  24. (1997). Office of the Inspector General(OIG)
  25. (2005). Profiling a methodology for economic growth and convergence : learning from the EU e-procurement experience for central and eastern doi
  26. (2001). Roadmap for success, 2nd Edition,
  27. (2007). The Delphi Method for Graduate Research,
  28. (1999). The European draft directive on a common framework for electronic signatures, doi
  29. (2002). The Industrial Dynamics of Internet Services,
  30. (1975). The policy Delphi, doi
  31. (2001). The potential impact of electronic procurement and global sourcing within the UK construction industry,
  32. (2004). Use of ICT for E-Procurement in the UK Construction Industry : A Survey of SMES Readiness,
  33. (2001). Web-Centric Framework For Secure And Legally Binding Electronic Transactions in Large-scale A/E/C Projects, doi
  34. (2006). Website, (Available online at [accessed

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.