Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Argumentation meets adapted cognition: manipulation in media discourse on immigration

By Christopher Hart

Abstract

Critical discourse analysis has focussed extensively on argumentation in anti-immigration discourse where a specific suite of argumentation strategies has been identified as constitutive of the discourse. The successful perlocutionary effects of these arguments are analysed as products of pragmatic processes based on ‘common-sense’ reasoning schemes known as topoi. In this paper, I offer an alternative explanation grounded in cognitive-evolutionary psychology. Specifically, it is shown that a number of argumentation schemes identified as recurrent in anti-immigration discourse relate to two cognitive mechanisms proposed in evolutionary psychology: the cheater detection and avoidance mechanism (Cosmides 1989) and epistemic vigilance (Sperber et al. 2010). It is further suggested that the potential perlocutionary effects of argument acts in anti-immigration discourse, in achieving sanction for discriminatory practices, may arise not as the product of intentional-inferential processes but as a function of cognitive heuristics and biases provided by these mechanisms. The impact of such arguments may therefore be best characterised in terms of manipulation rather than persuasion

Topics: L200, P300, Q100
Publisher: Elsevier
Year: 2013
OAI identifier: oai:nrl.northumbria.ac.uk:6261

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2006). An evolutionary perspective on testimony and argumentation. doi
  2. (1992). Argumentation, communication and fallacies: A pragma-dialectic perspective. doi
  3. (1992). Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. doi
  4. (2004). Confirmation bias. In
  5. (2011). Constraining context: A pragmatic account of cognitive manipulation. doi
  6. (2010). Critical discourse analysis and cognitive science: New perspectives on immigration discourse. doi
  7. (2009). Defining manipulative discourse: The pragmatics of cognitive illusions. doi
  8. (1994). Descartes' error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. doi
  9. (2001). Discourse and discrimination: Rhetorics of racism and antiSemitism. doi
  10. (2006). Discourse and manipulation. doi
  11. (2010). Epistemic vigilance. doi
  12. (2000). Evolutionary psychology and the emotions. doi
  13. (2008). Evolutionary psychology research methods.
  14. (1997). Evolutionary psychology: A primer. doi
  15. (2001). Fundamentals of argumentation theory: A handbook of historical backgrounds and contemporary developments. doi
  16. (1978). Further notes on logic and conversation. doi
  17. (1997). How the mind works. doi
  18. (1994). Is the acquisition of social categories based on domain-specific competence or on knowledge transfer? doi
  19. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. doi
  20. (2005). Language and power. doi
  21. (2011). Legitimising assertions and the logico-rhetorical module: Evidence and epistemic vigilance in media discourse on immigration. doi
  22. (1999). Legitimizing immigration control: A discoursehistorical analysis. doi
  23. (1975). Logic and conversation. doi
  24. (2008). Manipulation and ideologies in the twentieth century: Discourse, language, mind. doi
  25. (2006). Mediation between discourse and society: Assessing cognitive approaches in CDA. doi
  26. (2005). Missing links in mainstream CDA: Modules, blends and the critical instinct. doi
  27. (2005). Mystification and social agent absences: A critical discourse analysis using evolutionary psychology. doi
  28. (2011). On combining pragma-dialectics with critical discourse analysis.
  29. (2000). On the analysis of parliamentary debates on immigration.
  30. (1997). On the problem of bias in political argumentation: An investigation into discussions about political asylum in Germany and Austria. doi
  31. (2003). Prehistoric dangers and contemporary prejudices. doi
  32. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition, 2nd edn. doi
  33. (2002). Sense and nonsense: Evolutionary perspectives on human behaviour. doi
  34. (1998). The evolution of conformist transmission and the emergence of between-group differences. doi
  35. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. doi
  36. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. doi
  37. (1989). The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task. doi
  38. (1983). The modularity of mind: An essay on faculty psychology. doi
  39. (1994). The modularity of thought and the epidemiology of representations. doi
  40. (2000). The reality of racism: On analyzing parliamentary debates on immigration.
  41. (2005). Towards a typology of manipulative processes. doi
  42. (2004). Validity effect. In
  43. (2000). We demand that the foreigners adapt to our lifestyle': Political discourse on immigration laws in Austria and the United Kingdom.
  44. (1992). Who cares about fallacies? In doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.