Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Accelerating positive change in electronic records management: headline findings from a major research project

By Julie McLeod, Sue Childs and Rachel Hardiman

Abstract

This article outlines 10 headline findings from a three-year multidisciplinary project, funded by the UK Arts and Humanities Research Council, on electronic records management (ERM). It also presents examples of solutions to try, or to avoid, grounded in experience. A range of strategies and tactics exist and, although their relevance and success is very contextualised, they could be adopted or adapted in many scenarios. The findings highlight the complexity of the ERM challenge, the interrelationship of people, processes and systems/technology, and the predominant and powerful role of people in accelerating positive change, or not. Two strategic conclusions are drawn which are particularly important for records professionals to address: (1) the need to articulate a vision of successful ERM and (2) the need to reinterpret records management principles in the electronic environment

Topics: P100
Publisher: Australian Society of Archivists
Year: 2011
OAI identifier: oai:nrl.northumbria.ac.uk:5604

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2011). 11 Northumbria University, ‘AC +erm project: Vignettes’, available at http://www.northumbria.ac.uk/static/5007/ceispdf/vig.pdf, accessed 7
  2. (2011). 13 Northumbria University, ‘AC +erm project website: Conferences and publications’, available at http://www.northumbria.ac.uk/sd/academic/ceis/re/isrc/themes/rmarea/erm/diss/conf_diss/?view=Standard , accessed 7
  3. (2011). 19 Northumbria University, ‘AC +erm Project colloquia and summaries: Colloquia 1-3 People, processes and technology’, available at http://www.northumbria.ac.uk/static/5007/ceispdf/coll_1_3.pdf, accessed 7
  4. (2007). A leader’s framework for decision making’,
  5. (2011). AC +erm Project: Philosophical, Paradigmatic and Methodological Underpinnings’, available at http://www.northumbria.ac.uk/static/5007/ceispdf/method.pdf, accessed 7
  6. (2010). AC +erm Project: Transforming information and records management through research and development’,
  7. (2011). AC +erm website’, available at www.northumbria.ac.uk/acerm, accessed 7
  8. (2009). Achieving the right balance: recordkeeping informatics. Part 1,
  9. (2009). Centre for Reviews and Dissemination Systematic Reviews. ‘CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care’, doi
  10. (1996). Erlandsson, ‘Electronic records management: a literature review‘ ICA,
  11. (2007). Examining the issues & challenges of email & e-communications’,
  12. (2006). Exploring the essence of records management: engaging with experts’,
  13. (2011). Findings section: Northumbria University, ‘AC +erm Final Report’, available at http://www.northumbria.ac.uk/static/5007/ceispdf/final.pdf, accessed 7
  14. (1995). Managing records in the modern office: taming the wild frontier’,
  15. (2008). Managing the crowd: rethinking records management for the Web 2.0 world’, doi
  16. (2005). p.8. 4 Arts and Humanities Research Council www.ahrc.ac.uk The project team would like to acknowledge the support provided by the AHRC to help fund this research.
  17. (2011). Paradigmatic and Methodological Underpinnings’, available at http://www.northumbria.ac.uk/static/5007/ceispdf/method.pdf, accessed 7
  18. (2011). Risk and records management: Investigating risk and risk management in the context of records and information management in the electronic environment’,
  19. (2001). The impact of Critical Success Factors across the stages of Enterprise resource Planning Implementations,” doi
  20. (2003). The new dynamics of strategy: Sense-making in a complex and complicated world’, doi
  21. (2008). The role of virtual folders in developing an electronic document and records management system: meeting user and records management needs’, doi
  22. (1996). Theory and application of the Delphi Technique’,
  23. (2008). Toolkits for advancing practice',
  24. (2011). Using the systematic literature review method in an information management discipline’, article in preparation,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.