Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Forensic DNA databases in England and the Netherlands: governance, structure and performance compared

By Victor Toom


How do liberal democracies govern forensic DNA databasing? That is the question being asked in this contribution by focussing on the rules for inclusion of DNA databases in England & Wales and the Netherlands. The two different modes of governance shall be evaluated by taking into account models and ideas in each society regarding the two imperatives of 'crime control' and 'due process'. Another question tentatively examined in this contribution is how these modes of governance impact the performance of national DNA databases. The analysis provided in this article argues that, when compared with the English and Welsh mode of governance, the Dutch mode of governance is more beneficial for the protection of individual rights and the effective use of resources

Topics: F400
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Year: 2012
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2012). Bodies of science and law: forensic DNA profiling, biological bodies and biopower." doi
  2. (2012). Bracketing off populations does not advance ethical reflection on EVCs." doi
  3. Case of S. and Marper v the United Kingdom, Applications nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, 4 December. Strasbourg: European Court of Human Rights.
  4. (2009). Constitutional and Administrative Law, 7th edition. London and
  5. (2010). DNA databases and the forensic imaginary." doi
  6. (2009). DNA databases."
  7. (2011). Dragers van Waarheid. Twintig Jaar Forenisch DNA-onderzoek in Nederland [Carriers of Truth.
  8. (2011). ENFSI Survey on DNA Databases in Europe." European Network of Forensic Science Institutes, available online at: (accessed: 28
  9. (2008). Forensic DNA phenotyping: regulatory issues." doi
  10. (2004). Forensic DNA sampling and the England and Wales national DNA database: a sceptical approach." doi
  11. (2011). Genetic Justice. DNA Databanks, Criminal Investigations, and Civil Liberties. doi
  12. (2008). Genetic Policing. The Use of DNA in Criminal Investigations. doi
  13. (1990). Genetic Witness. Forensic Uses of DNA Tests. doi
  14. (2010). Inquisitorial forensic DNA profiling in the Netherlands and the expansion of the forensic genetic body." doi
  15. (2009). Keeping the Right People on the DNA Database. Science and Public Protection. London: Home Office.
  16. (2009). Nothing to Hide, Nothing to Fear? Balancing Individual Rights and the
  17. (2007). Nuffield Council on Bioethics doi
  18. (2008). Police powers."
  19. (2008). Policing since 1945."
  20. (2011). Protection of Freedoms Bill. Explanatory Notes, Bill 146. London: House of Commons.
  21. (2009). Reversing the Rise of the Surveillance State. 11 Measures to Protect Personal Privacy and Hold Government to Account. London: Conservative Party.
  22. (2008). Silent witness, articulate collectives: DNA evidence and the inference of visible traits." doi
  23. (2008). The DNA Field Experiment. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Use of DNA in the Investigation of High-Volume Crimes." Washington DC: The Urban Institute.
  24. (2010). The Future of Forensic Bioinformation. London: Nuffield Foundation.
  25. (2007). The Politics of Life Itself. Biomedicine, Power, doi
  26. (2010). The PrĂ¼m regime: Situated dis/empowerment in transnational DNA profile exchange." doi
  27. (2006). The social and legal construction of suspects." doi
  28. (2011). Transnational exchange of forensic DNA: viability, legitimacy, and acceptability." doi
  29. (2008). Truth Machine. The Contentious History of DNA Fingerprinting. Chicago & London: doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.