Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Seeking out very like-minded others: exploring trust and advice issues in an online health support group

By Elizabeth Sillence


Online health communities are one source of information and advice in which people, patients and their carers can exchange information and experiential advice. This advice is likely to be mixed in nature with some congenial, i.e., supportive of a person's existing standpoint and some uncongenial. This study examines how people manage the process of advice giving in a cancer support group. A discourse analysis of data collected from an online message forum explores how participants manage to ask for and offer advice within a peer setting. The findings highlight a group who collectively see advice giving as one of their key functions and have developed mechanisms for portraying their competence and trustworthiness. Advice seekers use their initial message as a positioning statement to indicate the boundaries associated with their decision making and the parameters within which advice givers are permitted to operate. Members use a number of discursive techniques to deal with uncongenial advice including, humour, alignment with unnamed others and the presentation of idiosyncratic reasoning. Seeking out very like-minded others provides support and reinforcement for pre-existing views. The results are discussed in terms of the role of online health communities in decision making

Topics: C800, G900
Publisher: Inderscience
Year: 2010
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2007). Clinicians' attitudes to prostate cancer peer-support groups.
  2. (2008). Computer-mediated infertility support groups: An exploratory study of online experiences. Patient education and counselling,
  3. (1994). Discourse analysis: a new methodology for understanding the ideologies of health and illness.
  4. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behavior. London Sage.
  5. (1997). Discourses of counselling: HIV counselling as social interaction. Sage publications.
  6. (1999). Empathic communities: balancing emotional and factual communication.
  7. (2005). Evaluating peer support for prostate cancer: the Prostate Cancer Peer Support Inventory.
  8. (2002). Experts vs. Online Consumers: A Comparative Credibility Study of Health and Finance Web Sites. Consumer Web Watch Research Report
  9. (2003). Health risks on the internet: Establishing credibility on line.
  10. (2007). How do patients evaluate and make use of online health information?
  11. (1995). If I were you .
  12. (2002). Individual Trust in Online Firms: Scale development and Initial Test.
  13. (2002). Is nondirectiveness possible within the context of antenatal screening and testing?
  14. Network (2002). Clinical Practice Guidelines: Evidence-based Information and Recommendations for the Management of Localised Prostate Cancer. (Retrieved 25/11/08 from
  15. (2000). Online support for caregivers. Analysis of an Internet alzheimer mailgroup.
  16. (2008). Patient-centred care: What are the experiences of prostate cancer patients and their partners? Patient education and counselling,
  17. (2004). Personalisation and Trust: A Reciprocal Relationship? In
  18. (2008). Prostate Cancer. (Retrieved 10/11/08 from )
  19. (2005). Receiving social support online: an analysis of a computer-mediated support group for individuals living with Irritable Bowel Syndrome',
  20. (1981). Self-verification processes: How we sustain our selfconceptions.
  21. Stanford-Makovsky Web Credibilty Study 2002: Investigating what makes Web sites credible today, A Research Report by the Stanford Persuasive Technology Lab & Makovsky & Company, Stanford University. Retrieved from : .
  22. (1993). Strategies in the discourse of advice.
  23. (2006). The emergence of the identity of a fictional expert advice-giver in an American Internet advice column.
  24. (2004). The role of the Internet in patient practitioner relationships: Findings from a qualitative research study.
  25. (2005). Treatment decision-making strategies and influences in patients with localized prostate carcinoma.
  26. (2004). Trust and Mistrust of Online Health Sites.
  27. (2004). What do patients with prostate or breast cancer want from an Internet site? A qualitative study of information needs. Patient education and counselling,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.