Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Interrogating the academic research process in UK design education from design and business management perspectives

By Joyce Yee, Kamil Michlewski and Erik Bohemia


This paper explores the process of undertaking a PhD within the framework of the UK design education system, by examining it from two different perspectives. The authors come from different educational backgrounds, representing emic and etic perspectives respectively. Their viewpoints are triangulated and used as a basis for discussion around the following question: How well does design education prepare students for research-based activity? In addition, the historically dominant model in design education, which focuses mainly on vocational skills, is interrogated. On the one hand, the authors observe that this model is ill-equipped to provide designers with the critical skills and knowledge required for research-based projects. On the other hand, the authors recognize that traditional research-led education can result in a procedural and cognitive straitjacket. Discussion surrounding these issues will be presented in a case study format and used to inform further discussions on the role and wider influences of research in design education

Topics: W200, X200
Publisher: University of New South Wales
Year: 2007
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1985). A critical theory of self-directed learning', doi
  2. (1985). A new look at postgraduate failure.
  3. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: a revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives, doi
  4. (2006). ADIT: Art and Design Index to Thesis. Available at (Accessed:
  5. (2003). Case study research: design and methods. 3rd ed edn. Applied social research methods series; v.5. Thousand Oaks,
  6. (1997). Design practice and education: moving beyond the Bauhaus',
  7. (2004). Designerly Activity and Higher Degrees: Seminar papers from a staff development short course presented by Professor Bruce Archer at
  8. (2000). Doctoral Education in Design: Foundations for the future. La Clusaz, doi
  9. (1998). Doctoral education in design. doi
  10. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. The Jossey-Bass higher education series. doi
  11. (2000). Foundations: Doctoral education in design: Not everything made of steel is a battleship. La Clusaz,
  12. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: a new area of cognitive-development inquiry', doi
  13. (2000). Reliable knowledge in design',
  14. (1994). Strategies for managing and supervising the social science PhD',
  15. (2002). Survey of Post Graduates Funded by the Research Councils.
  16. (2006). The Higher Workforce in England: A Framework for the Future. Bristol: Higher Education Funding Council for
  17. (1986). Understanding and facilitating adult learning. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.