Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Attitudes to the rights and rewards for author contributions to repositories for teaching and learning

By Melanie Bates, Steve Loddington, Sue Manuel and Charles Oppenheim


In the United Kingdom over the past few years there has been a dramatic growth of national and regional repositories to collect and disseminate resources related to teaching and learning. Most notable of these are the Joint Information Systems Committee’s Online Repository for [Learning and Teaching] Materials as well as the Higher Education Academy’s subject specific resource databases. Repositories in general can hold a range of materials not only related to teaching and learning, but more recently the term ‘institutional repository’ is being used to describe a repository that has been established to support open access to a university’s research output. This paper reports on a survey conducted to gather the views of academics, support staff and managers on their past experiences and future expectations of the use of repositories for teaching and learning. The survey explored the rights and rewards associated with the deposit of materials into such repositories. The findings suggest what could be considered to be an ‘ideal’ repository from the contributors’ perspective and also outlines many of the concerns expressed by respondents in the survey

Topics: LB Theory and practice of education, LC1022 - 1022.25 Computer-assisted Education
Publisher: Taylor and Francis Ltd
Year: 2007
DOI identifier: 10.1080/09687760600837066
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2005). Contributing to FERLS survey: final report. Available online at: http:// (e-mail team to receive report).
  2. (2004). Digital rights management: final report (Linlithgow, Intrallect). Available online at: DRMFinalReportv2.pdf (accessed 15
  3. (2003). Engaging with the learning object economy, in: A. Littlejohn (Ed.) Reusing online resources: a sustainable approach to e-learning (London,
  4. (2004). Institutional repositories: hidden treasures,
  5. (2006). Open educational resources: forum report. Available online at:
  6. (2003). RoMEO Studies 1: the impact of copyright ownership on academic author self-archiving, doi
  7. (2005). Understanding faculty to improve content recruitment for institutional repositories, D-Lib Magazine. Available online at: foster/01foster.html (accessed 15

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.