The apparent fact that each of us coincides with a thinking animal
looks like a strong argument for our being animals (animalism). Some critics,
however, claim that this sort of reasoning actually undermines animalism.
According to them, the apparent fact that each human animal coincides with
a thinking body that is not an animal is an equally strong argument for our
not being animals. I argue that the critics' case fails for reasons that do not
affect the case for animalism
Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.