Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Total Quality Management : the development, application and analysis of a Total Quality Management paradigm in healthcare

By Michael E. Waddington


The research programme focuses on Total Quality Management adoption and application.\ud TQM which is established in a number of businesses and industries has more recently been\ud introduced into healthcare. TQM definition and eclectic paradigm has been developed and\ud tested for establishing quality performance and distinguishing radical change and continuous\ud improvement approach. A number of critical elements and variables concerning\ud implementation and application are identified which pertain to organisations which through\ud size and bureaucracy operate with diverse missions, a wide range of systems and are\ud characterised by degrees of rigidity from an employee mix of multiple knowledge,\ud understanding competences skills and hence commitment.\ud \ud \ud Research was conducted in healthcare provider organisations, which involved eighty-three\ud NHS hospitals/Trusts, wherein two pilot, twelve TQM demonstration and sixty-nine sites\ud were involved. The main focus concerned a case study Trust, which although\ud demonstrating keen interest in quality management had not reached the formative stages of\ud developing TQM definition or paradigm.\ud \ud \ud The research framework is based on a number of approaches in that methods selected for\ud evaluation were appropriate both to the situation and the context of TQM strategies being\ud examined. Intention was to identify successes and failures of the TQM processes applied,\ud establish similarities and distinguishable differences and determine extent to which TOM\ud objectives were achieved and the impact of the processes on specific groups.\ud \ud \ud The investigation was undertaken using longitudinal analysis which involved in-depth\ud interviews with top managers and clinicians and a mix of employees, customers, potential\ud customers and purchasers in the form of managers, consultants, hospital doctors, nurses,\ud support services personnel, patients, members of the public and GPs. TOM Awareness and\ud Action Seminars and Workshops involving personnel from a variety of international\ud healthcare organisations provided an additional source of data. Self-completion\ud questionnaires were also used.\ud \ud \ud Data analysis compares and contrasts varying TQM models, processes, activities and results\ud from degree of emphasis placed on critical elements and variables. Stage predictions and\ud resulting outcomes are presented and quality of care improvements suggested from analysis\ud of customer perceptions of quality and value. The findings show significant variations in\ud approach between the hospitals/Trusts in matters which concern organisation, management\ud and culture issues, resulting in a high proportion viewing TOM process as evolution from\ud quality assurance to radical change, hospital process re-engineering and patient focused\ud care A minority only included such processes in their application of TQM.\ud \ud \ud Key conclusions result from attempt at establishing some measure of success and failure\ud from TQM implementation and application. Findings contribute to the extant literature\ud specifically in that beyond top management and clinician commitment to high level strategic\ud focus is a combination of facilitator-led culture change, motivation and shared values\ud directing attention to exceeding that of merely doing enough for reducing poor quality and\ud customer complaints. Patient involvement in TOM is more problematic than literature\ud suggests from both the patients and professionals perspectives of patient empowerment.\ud \ud \ud Bottom-up action focused TQM paradigm working simultaneously with top down support\ud and commitment requires barrier breaking, culture transformation and the establishment of\ud internal/external customer and supplier chains and seeking to establish opportunities for\ud continuous improvement and radical change in advance of attempts at in-depth\ud implementation and evaluation. It is not over-statement to conclude that the majority of\ud managers and clinicians were unaware of the costs of getting things wrong.\ud \ud \ud \ud Despite TOM being acted upon as driving force for competition most had limited knowledge\ud of how much non-quality cost them, suggesting that they had not earlier thought it\ud necessary to measure the costs of none or low quality. Research results, irrespective of\ud applications definition or paradigm, question the views that TQM is long-term process.\ud Whether these may be concluded as desire to integrate TOM with other foci or vacuum\ud sucking in panaceas was unclear. It was clear however that although quality in healthcare\ud is sacred total quality management is not

Topics: R1, HD28, HD
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1976c): Prevention and Health: Everybody's Business.
  2. A and A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and its ImpliBerry, L L(1985): cations for Future Research. doi
  3. (1990). A Delivering Quality Service: Balancing Customer doi
  4. (1977). A Stages of Small Group Development Revisited. Group doi
  5. (1993). Abstracted - The Textbook of TQ in Health Care
  6. (1988). Administration or Public Management? Teaching Politics, doi
  7. (1988). Administration the Beginning of the End? Teaching Politics, Vol 17,
  8. (1995). Advancing Quality. Total Quality Management in the NHS. doi
  9. (1993). Co-ordinating Community Care: Multidisciplinary Teams and Care Management in Health and Social Services. doi
  10. DHSS (1981a): Report of a Study on Community Care.
  11. DHSS (1981c): Care in Action.
  12. (1979). Doctor-Patient Relationships.
  13. (1993). Health Survey for England.
  14. House of Commons 1st Report 1987/8. Resourcing the NHS Short Term HC 214 - Ill. House of Commons (1989b): Issues, Social Services Committee. HMSO. Resourcing the NHS. The Governments White Paper 'Working for Patients', Social Services Committee.
  15. (1990). House of Commons 6th Report. Choice for Service Users, Social Services
  16. (1990). House of Commons 9th Report. Community Care: Quality, Social Services
  17. (1985). House of Lords doi
  18. (1991). How Consumer Evaluation Process Differ Between Goods and Services. Marketing of Services.
  19. (1994). Incorporating Quality Performance Appraisal Systems. doi
  20. (1984). Inquiry Report, Social Services Committee.
  21. (1989). Integrating TQM and Employee Involvement. Survey
  22. (1981). La progettazione dei meccanismi di controllo organizzativo.
  23. (1971). lshikawa, K
  24. (1994). Measuring Performance for Business Results. doi
  25. (1971). National Health Service Re-Organisation: A Consultative Document. doi
  26. (1970). National Health Service. The Future Structure of the National Health Service in England.
  27. (1992). On the State of the Public Health. The Annual Report of the Chief Medical Officer. doi
  28. (1979). Patients First.
  29. (1987). Personal Quality (Time Manager International)
  30. (1992). Policy Evaluation in the Private Sector: Approaches and
  31. (1994). Practical Benchmarking - The Complete Guide. doi
  32. (1991). Primary Care Quality Through Teamwork.
  33. (1994). Quality Costs: Their Impact on Company Strategy and Profitability. Technical Communications (Pub) Ltd. Research Methods in the Social Sciences. St Martins Press. Getting Better with Information.
  34. (1992). Quality Process Management.
  35. (1992). Question 1: TRUST EMPLOYEES: As you know the Trust has been applying TOM process since
  36. (1980). Report on the Working Group on Inequalities in Health. doi
  37. (1993). Right On. Health Service Journal.
  38. (1990). The NHS Reforms and You. Central Office of Information.
  39. (1991). The Patient's Charter. doi
  40. (1981). The Primary Care Team: Report of a Joint Working Party (The Harding Report).
  41. (1977). The Way Forward.
  42. (1989). Total Quality Management (Butterworth/Heinemann) Crosby doi
  43. Values and the Management of (1993): Change in British Hospitals. doi
  44. (1990). What Is Quality In doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.