Contemporary movements for the reform of global institutions advocate greater\ud transparency, greater democracy, and greater accountability. Of these three, accountability is the\ud master value. Transparency is valuable as means to accountability: more transparent institutions\ud reveal whether officials have performed their duties. Democracy is valuable as a mechanism of\ud accountability: elections enable the people peacefully to remove officials who have not done\ud what it is their responsibility to do. “Accountability,” it has been said, “is the central issue of our\ud time.”\ud \ud \ud The focus of this paper is accountability in international development aid: that range of\ud efforts sponsored by the world’s rich aimed at permanently bettering the conditions of the\ud world’s poor. We begin by surveying some of the difficulties in international development work\ud that have raised concerns that development agencies are not accountable enough for producing\ud positive results in alleviating poverty. We then examine the concept of accountability, and\ud survey the general state of accountability in development agencies. A high-altitude map of the\ud main proposals for greater accountability in international development follows, and the paper\ud concludes by exploring one specific proposal for increasing accountability in development aid
To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.