Location of Repository

Seeing yourself as others see you: developing personal attributes in the rehearsal

By Mark Pulman

Abstract

An important part of the process that enables us to improve ourselves as musicians in group music making involves developing an awareness of our personal attributes as they are displayed in the rehearsal. In order to help students become more aware of themselves and of their band members’ personal attributes as they rehearse, a peer assessment system was established. The project was piloted and developed at Barnsley College and University of Huddersfield (Barnsley Campus) with first year undergraduates on the BA Popular Music\ud course across 2000–2008. Individuals agreed to allow their bands to identify particular personal attributes for each member that, they felt, could be improved and used as peer assessment criteria. In-depth interviews were conducted with 16 students over a 4-year period and the following areas emerged as a focus of these: self-knowledge, feedback, confidence, honesty. The study has implications for devising peer assessment systems that are responsive to individual learners and their unique needs. It also suggests the desirability of providing peer assessment activities that might foster trust among participants and, if so, supports the provision of exceptional feedback. Now in its ninth year, this system has been\ud refined into a model

Topics: M1
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Year: 2009
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.hud.ac.uk:5594

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (1986). Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. doi
  2. (2006). Aligning assessment with long-term learning’, doi
  3. (2004). Assessing Group Practice.
  4. (1994). Assessing Learners doi
  5. (1993). Barriers to reflection on experience’, in
  6. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research’,
  7. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. doi
  8. (1994). Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry’, in N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks,
  9. (2005). Formative peer assessment in a CSCL environment: a case study’, Assessment and Evaluation doi
  10. (2000). Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students’, Assessment and Evaluation doi
  11. (2000). Grounded theory: objectivist and constructivist methods’, doi
  12. (1994). Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, doi
  13. (2005). Improving Assessment through Student Involvement: Practical Solutions for Aiding Learning
  14. (2003). Improving students’ learning by developing their understanding of assessment criteria and processes’, doi
  15. (2009). IP address: 161.112.232.36 Mark Pu lman
  16. (2009). IP address: 161.112.232.36 See i ng you r se l f a s o the r s see y ou
  17. (2008). Knowing Yourself through Others’: Peer Assessment in Popular Music. Unpublished PhD Thesis.
  18. (1976). Mind in Society. doi
  19. (2004). Peer assessment in musical performance: the development, trial and evaluation of a methodology for the Australian tertiary environment’, doi
  20. (2004). Peer assessment in popular music’, in doi
  21. (2004). Peer assessment of tertiary music performance: opportunities for understanding performance assessment and performing through experience and self-reflection’, doi
  22. (1984). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods. doi
  23. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks, doi
  24. (1998). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks, doi
  25. (1995). Radical Constructivism: A Way of Knowing and Learning. doi
  26. (2004). Small Group Teaching. doi
  27. (2001). Student perceptions of what helps them learn and develop in education’, doi
  28. (2003). Teaching for Quality Learning at University. 2nd edn. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education/Open doi
  29. (2005). The impact of stress in self- and peer assessment’, doi
  30. (2002). The use of exemplars and formative feedback when using student derived marking criteria in peer and self-assessment’, Assessment and Evaluation doi
  31. (2004). Using assessment criteria as learning criteria’. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.