Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Relating Target Hardening to Burglary Risk: \ud Experiences from Liverpool

By Andrew D. Newton, Michelle Rogerson and Alex Hirschfield


This paper explores the relationship between the allocation of target hardening and burglary risk based on recent research in the City of Liverpool. Individual property‐level data from a range of sources was collated for each residential property in the city using a unique property reference number. This produced a rich data set enabling burglary and target hardening activity to be analysed through time at both the individual property‐level and across a variety of spatial units (e.g. super output areas, wards and regeneration areas). The results highlight an imperfect alignment between target hardening and burglary risk locations largely attributable to the influence of Liverpool’s area based regeneration initiatives. The paper makes the case for prioritising properties for target hardening based on a combination of the prior burglary history of individual properties, the burglary risk of an area, and existing levels of target harden\ud ing protection

Topics: HN, HV
Publisher: British Society of Criminology
Year: 2008
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2001). A GIS-linked Database for Monitoring Repeat Domestic Burglary.
  2. (1955). A methodological analysis of segregation indices’ doi
  3. (2000). An evaluation of secured by design housing within West Yorkshire. Briefing Note 7/00, London: Home Office.
  4. (2004). Assessing the impact of the Reducing Burglary Initiative in southern England and Wales, Home Office Online Report 42/04, London: Home Office. doi
  5. (1995). Biting Back: Tackling Repeat Burglary and Car Crime. Crime Detection and Prevention Series Paper No 58. London: Home Office.
  6. (1999). Burglary of Domestic Dwellings: Findings from the British Crime Survey. Home Office Statistical Bulletin, Issue 4/99. London: Home Office.
  7. (1989). Crime Prevention Delivery: The work of crime prevention officers,
  8. (2004). CrimeStat III--A Spatial Statistics Program for the Analysis of Crime Incident Locations. doi
  9. (2005). Evaluation for lesson learning,
  10. (2004). Explanatory Note for Online Reports 40/04 to 43/04, Home Office Online Report 39/04 London: Home Office.
  11. (2005). GIS and Crime Mapping. doi
  12. (2003). Infectious Burglaries: A Test of the Near Repeat Hypothesis, doi
  13. (2003). Opportunities, Precipitators and Criminal Decisions: A Reply to Wortley's Critique of Situational Crime Prevention,
  14. (2005). Progress and Prospects in the Prevention of Repeat Victimisation,
  15. (1997). Realistic Evaluation. doi
  16. (1998). Repeat Victimisation: Taking Stock,
  17. (1996). Safer Cities and Domestic Burglary, Home Office Research Study 164, Home Office:
  18. (1997). Situational Crime Prevention: Successful Case Studies, doi
  19. (2000). Targeting Resources for Crime Prevention,
  20. (2008). The Crime-Crime Prevention Relationship: A Manchester Case Study. doi
  21. (1993). The Enterprise Culture and the Inner City. doi
  22. (1981). The modifiable areal unit problem, doi
  23. (2004). The Stability of Space-Time Clusters of Burglary. doi
  24. (1971). The urban mosaic. London: doi
  25. (2008). Vulnerability and Risk: Some Lessons from the UK Reducing Burglary Initiative. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.