Location of Repository

Financial Crisis and Its Impact on the Economies of China and India

By Kalim Siddiqui

Abstract

The study will focus on the current financial crisis and its impact on the growth, trade and employment in emerging market economies (EMEs) namely China and India. The emerging market economies are characterized as transitional, which means that they are in the process of moving from a closed to an open market economy. It is said that by adoption of neoliberal policies, the economy will suppose to lead to a better economic performance levels, as well as transparency and efficiency in the capital market. \ud \ud \ud The proponents of the ‘neoliberal economic policies’ always maintained that it is working and as a consequence, for example, the Indian economy is growing at high rates, the stock market is booming, foreign reserve is at a comfortably high level. The ‘free trade’ policy is making availability of a variety of goods unimaginable earlier as a mark of the benefits of globalization. The ‘invisible hand’ of the market, tries to pretend that market operates in isolation. On the basis most recent available data and studies the author has examined the impact of financial crisis on the economic growth and various sectors of the economies in China and India. \ud \ud \ud Finally, the author finds the argument that China emerging as the alterative engine of growth for the world economy is too ambitious. Some have suggested that a ‘decoupled Asia’ through its own growth and expanding domestic demands would ensure higher imports demands for its growing economies and thus limit the economic slowdown in the developed economies. But this is unlikely due to: the US, EU and Japan together account for more than half of China’s exports, and as recession deepens, it is bound to affect export sector and overall economic activity in China

Topics: HC, HG
Publisher: Macrothink Institute
Year: 2009
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.hud.ac.uk:5722

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2008). (2009b) “China’s Dollar Dilemma”, Financial Times, 23rd February, London Fallows, James (2009) “China’s Way Forward”,
  2. (1948). (2009b) “In Downturn, China Sees Path to Growth”, The New York Times, 17th March: New York Research
  3. (1961). Capital, volume one,
  4. (2006). Capitalism Unleashed: Finance, Globalization and Welfare, doi
  5. (2008). Central Statistical Organization (CSO), National Accounts Statistics, accessed on 25th
  6. (2008). China Changes the whole World”, Financial Times,
  7. (2008). Contradictions of Economic Growth in the Neoliberal Era”, doi
  8. (2007). Dancing with Giants: China, India and the Global Economy, doi
  9. (1976). De-industrialization in India in the nineteenth century: some theoretical implications”, doi
  10. (2003). Dreaming with the BRICS”, quoted in China and India: Opportunities and Challenges for UK Business,
  11. (2009). Fighting off Depression”, Internal Herald Tribune,
  12. (1948). For example, India’s merchandise export declined from 24.3 % to 2.2 % between 2006-07 and 2007-08, however the fall in growth of services exports was much sharper,
  13. For more detail discussion on this issue see Kalim Siddiqui (2009a & b) 4. Note that investment and export constitute major sources of demand for industrial goods.
  14. (2009). Global recovery rests on a fresh US approach to China”, The Guardian, 13th Feb. http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/feb/13/china-economics Keynes,
  15. (2001). Globalization and FDI in Asian Developing Countries”, doi
  16. (2003). Globalization and its Challenges”, doi
  17. (1998). Globalization at the Cross Roads, doi
  18. (1996). Growth of Modern Industries under Colonial Regime: Industrial Development
  19. (1990). Historical Roots of Mass Poverty
  20. (2007). Historical Statistics for the World Economy, Development Centre, doi
  21. (2007). Historical Statistics for the World Economy, Development Centre, Paris: OECD 2. For a lucid exposition of the decoupling theory, reference may be made to The Economist,
  22. (1997). How to fix the Asian economies”, New York Times, 31st October The Economist, (2008a) “The Decoupling Debate”,
  23. (2009). India: Opportunities and Challenges for UK Business
  24. Kalim (2009a) “Globalization and Neo-liberal Economic Reforms in India: A Critical Review”
  25. Kalim (2009b) “The Political Economy of Growth in China and India”, Journal of Asian Public Policy (JAPP), doi
  26. (2006). Manufacturing, Service and Premature De-industrialization in Developing Countries”,
  27. (1990). Political Economy of Terrorism – The Process of Capital Accumulation and the Problems of Democratic Rights
  28. (1983). Subject to Famine: Food Crisis and Economic Change in doi
  29. (2009). The Economic Crisis and Contemporary Capitalism”, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. doi
  30. (1998). The Economist, (2009c) “South Africa’s Economy – Tough times ahead”, 14th February, pp.62-63: London The New York Times
  31. (1998). The Export of Agricultural Commodities, Poverty and Ecological Crisis: A Case
  32. (2006). The Limits to Capital, doi
  33. (2004). The Market that Failed: a decade of neoliberal economic reforms in India,
  34. (2000). The much faster growth of India’s exports is attested to by the fact that between 1995and
  35. (1983). The natural system of political economy, 1837, translated by William Otto
  36. (2008). Underlying Strength of Emerging Economies”, Financial Times, 5th November: London Bradsher,
  37. (2006). What’s so Special About China’s Exports?” China and the World Economy, doi
  38. (2008). World Development Indicators (CD-ROM), doi
  39. (2007). World Economic Outlook, April, Washington DC: doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.