Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Is Kant’s transcendental deduction of the categories fit for purpose?

By Anil Gomes

Abstract

James Van Cleve has argued that Kant’s Transcendental Deduction of the categories shows, at most, that we must apply the categories to experience. And this falls short of Kant’s aim, which is to show that they must so apply. In this discussion I argue that once we have noted the differences between the first and second editions of the Deduction, this objection is less telling. But Van Cleve’s objection can help illuminate the structure of the B Deduction, and it suggests an interesting reason why the rewriting might have been thought necessary

Topics: phil
Publisher: Cambridge Journals
Year: 2010
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.bbk.ac.uk.oai2:2922
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/2922/... (external link)
  • http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S136... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.