Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

A framework for deriving policy implications from research

By Aidan Wilcox, Alex Hirschfield and University of Huddersfield Applied Criminology Centre

Abstract

Scopic (social contexts of pathways into crime) is a five year ESRC funded\ud programme of research which aims to achieve a better understanding of how young\ud people become involved in crime. A key consideration in a research programme of\ud this type is how best to generate policy implications from academic research. This\ud report sets out a proposal as to how this might be achieved. It begins with a brief\ud description of scopic; we then set out a framework for deriving policy implications\ud which takes into account the validity of the research, and the practicality, feasibility\ud and ethics of proposed policy options. Consideration is then given to how policy\ud implications might be made concrete. The report concludes with a case study in\ud which the model is applied to one of the early published research papers from scopic\ud and we comment on the strengths and weaknesses of this approach

Topics: H1, HM
Publisher: University of Huddersfield
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.hud.ac.uk:5841

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2005). (eds) Preventing Crime : What Works, What Doesn't, What's Promising doi
  2. (1981). A Method for Assessing the Quality of a Randomized Control Trial’, doi
  3. (2000). All the Evidence Shows…”: Reasonable Expectations of Educational Research’, doi
  4. (1998). Applied Policy Research: Concepts and Cases. doi
  5. (2000). Assessing Correctional Rehabilitation: Policy, Practice, and Prospects’
  6. (1995). Assessing the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials’, doi
  7. (2007). Available online at: http://www.policyhub.gov.uk/docs/qqe_rep.pdf (accessed 3
  8. (1995). Boot Camps: Return of the Short, Sharp Shock. London: Prison Reform Trust.
  9. (2005). Cambridge Network for the Study of the Social Contexts of Pathways in Crime: Annual Report for Period
  10. (2003). Cognitivebehavioural Treatment for Imprisoned Offenders: An Evaluation doi
  11. (2004). Crime Prevention: Facts, Fallacies and the Future
  12. (2007). Do not cite without authors’ permission © Wilcox and Hirschfield
  13. (2004). Does more evidence lead to better policy? The Implications of Explicit Priority-Setting in New Zealand’s Health Policy for Evidence-based Policy’ doi
  14. (1998). Establishing Causality in Evaluations of Comprehensive Community Initiatives
  15. (2005). Ethical Issues in Funding Orphan Drug Research and Development’ doi
  16. (2002). Evaluating Multi-agency Anti-crime Partnerships: Theory, Design and Measurement Issues’
  17. (1989). Evaluation Research on Correctional Treatment in West Germany: A Meta-Analysis’ doi
  18. (2003). Evidence-based Youth Justice? Some Valuable Lessons from an Evaluation for the Youth Justice Board’, doi
  19. (1992). Explaining the Beginning, Progress and Ending of Antisocial Behaviour from Birth to Adulthood’
  20. (2001). for Reviews and Dissemination
  21. (2002). From the Source to the Mainstream is Uphill: The Challenge of Transferring Knowledge of Crime Prevention through Replication, Innovation and Anticipation’ in N. Tilley (ed) Analysis for Crime Prevention
  22. (1992). Implications of the Failure to Replicate the Minneapolis Experiment Findings’ doi
  23. (2000). Influence or Irrelevance Can Social Science Improve Government?
  24. (2005). Introductory Guide to the Statistics of Molecular Genetics’ doi
  25. (2004). Is Evidence Based Government Possible? Jerry Lee
  26. (2004). Joined-up Services to Tackle Youth Crime: A Case-Study in doi
  27. (2003). Life With (or Without) Father: The Benefits of Living with Two Biological Parents Depend on the Father's Antisocial Behavior’ doi
  28. (2002). Methodological Quality Standards for Evaluation Research Paper Presented at the Third Annual Jerry Lee Crime Prevention Symposium,
  29. (2007). Pathways into Policy: A Study of the Relationship between Research, Policy and Government Huddersfield: Applied Criminology Centre.
  30. (2005). Policy Analysis, Policy Practice and Political Science. doi
  31. (1998). Preventing Crime: What Works, What Doesn't, What's Promising doi
  32. (1975). Problems of Conceptualization and Measurement in Studying Policy Impacts. In
  33. (2003). Quality in Qualitative Evaluation: A Framework for Assessing Research Evidence London: Cabinet Office.
  34. (1989). Quality of Study Rating Form: An Instrument for Synthesizing Evaluation Studies’,
  35. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings Chicago: Rand McNally College.
  36. (1997). Realistic Evaluation doi
  37. (1999). Reconviction Following a Community Sentence: Explaining the Role of Social Factors Home Office Research Study 192 London: Home Office. doi
  38. (2006). Revisiting the Association Between Reading Achievement and Antisocial Behavior: New Evidence of an Environmental Explanation from a Twin Study’ doi
  39. (1985). Sentencing Theory, Law and Practice London: Butterworths.
  40. (2005). Social Value Judgements: Principles for the Development of NICE Guidance London: NICE. Available online at: http://www.nice.org.uk/download.aspx?o=283494
  41. (2005). Status Quo Bias in Bioethics: The Case for Human Enhancement Paper Presented at Oxford-Scandinavia Ethics Summit 13-15 July,
  42. (2003). Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. doi
  43. (1988). The Construction and Deconstruction of Educational Policy doi
  44. (1998). The Delphi List: a Criteria List for Quality Assessment Do not cite without authors’ permission © Wilcox and Hirschfield
  45. (1998). The Feasibility of Creating a Checklist for the Assessment of the Methodological Quality doi
  46. (2003). The Foresters' Dilemma: The Influence of Police Research on Police Practice’ in L. Zedner and A. Ashworth (eds) The Criminological Foundations of Penal Policy: Essays in Honour of Roger Hood Oxford:
  47. (1984). The Minneapolis Domestic Violence Experiment Police Foundation Report No. 1 Washington DC: Police Foundation.
  48. (2000). The Research Methods Knowledge Base (2nd ed.) Available online at: http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/
  49. (1976). The Urban Criminal London:
  50. (2005). The Validity of Reconviction Studies (Unpublished PhD Thesis) Oxford:
  51. (2006). Understanding Policy Options Home Office Online Report 06/06 Available online at: http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs06/rdsolr0606.pdf Logan,
  52. (2003). Understanding What Works: Accredited Cognitive Skills Programmes for Adult Men and Young Offenders Home Office Research Findings 226 London: Home Office.
  53. (1991). Urban Crime, Criminals, and Victims: the Swedish Experience in an Anglo-American Comparative Perspective. doi
  54. (1994). What Works in
  55. (2007). Youth Justice: Ideas, Policy, Practice (2nd ed). doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.