An Assessment Audit is described consisting of 47 questions, each being scored 0 to 4, by the module team depending on the extent to which the audit point was satisfied. Scores of 2 or less indicated unsatisfactory provision. Audits were carried out on 14 bioscience- or medicine- based modules in 13 universities. \ud \ud There was great variability between modules in the hours spent by:\ud \ud • teachers in direct contact with students (12 to 914);\ud • teachers involved in the process of assessment (2 to 372);\ud • students actually being assessed (2 to 60 hours per student);\ud • students in the teaching and learning process (35 to 300). \ud \ud The highest scoring module obtained 133 out of 188 (71%) with 11 out of 47 items scored at 2 or less while the lowest scoring module obtained 47% with 27 items scoring 2 or less. Features consistently poorly addressed were:\ud \ud • consideration of learning objectives/assessment in other modules taken by the student;\ud • consideration of consistency among multiple markers;\ud • use of known mark sets to validate data processing;\ud • availability of exemplar answers;\ud • feedback on end-of-module assessments.\ud \ud A common issue concerns the isolation of modules and module teams. This suggests the need for a strengthening of the course thread and emphasis on the totality of the student learning experience rather than the individual module. The audit provides a framework within which course teams can reflect on and improve the quality of the assessment in their module. \u
To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.