Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

An evaluation of the multimedia personal computer as an assessment tool

By Francis Bryan Bell

Abstract

The aim of this research was to investigate and evaluate how computerised assessment\ud could be progressed using current advances in technology (1993-1996) such as the\ud increased computing power and storage capacity, and multimedia capabilities. This\ud research would be conducted with respect to a typical chemistry degree course.\ud \ud \ud After a detailed literature survey it was concluded that the major computerised\ud assessment technique was the multiple-choice format or a hybrid of it. A typical\ud degree course was analysed in order to determine the learning outcomes and if these\ud could be assessed by computerisation. Of the assessment methods used in a degree\ud course, it was found that 57% of these could be computerised to some extent. These\ud assessment methods were found to be objective in nature.\ud \ud \ud This research focused on investigating the feasibility of producing computerised\ud assessment methods that in effect used the computer as an electronic notepad and an\ud on-line tutor. Students would be able to input each step of their solution to a problem.\ud The student would be assessed on that step of their solution and not only on the end\ud answer.\ud \ud \ud It was found that computerised assessment could be extended beyond the multiplechoice\ud format to assessing students' process skills in problem solving. Students can\ud input each stage of their solution to a problem and receive feedback in real-time as to\ud whether or not their methodology is correct.\ud \ud \ud Several areas have been investigated: practical chemistry, in particular apparatus\ud assembly; physical chemistry, mathematical problem solving; organic chemistry,\ud reaction mechanisms; chemical information and retrieval. During these investigations\ud several prototypes of the applications were developed. These prototypes were\ud developed using Visual Basic 3.0 Professional for Windows 3.1. These prototypes\ud serve as the data that support this research

Topics: QA75, QD, L1
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.hud.ac.uk:5976

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. 10, Theme: Exploiting
  2. (1988). 53 Interesting Ways to Assess Your Students, doi
  3. A Comparison of Quantitative Questions in Open-Ended and Multiple-Choice Formats, doi
  4. A Comparison of the Nominal Response Model and the ThreeParameter Logistic Model doi
  5. A pedagogic model ofmulti-mediality, doi
  6. A practical introduction to authoringfor computer-assisted instruction: part 8: multi-media CAL, doi
  7. (1988). A Taxonomyfor the Timing ofFeedback in Computer-Based Instruction, Educational Technology,
  8. A Thesaurus-Linked Science Question-Banking System, doi
  9. Advice on Choosing an Authoring Package,
  10. Against multiple-choice questions, doi
  11. An innovative approach to data capture in automated assessment Program. doi
  12. An item bankfor multiple-choice questions, doi
  13. An overview ofthe uses of computer based assessment and diagnosis,
  14. And Others, Computerized Adaptive Testing Using the Partial Credit Model: Effects offtem
  15. Appendix I Leaming, Outcomes communicating orally and in writing
  16. (1993). Applications ofArtificial Intelligence in Chemistry
  17. Applications ofhypermedia in education,.
  18. (1994). Approaches to student assessment. Is computerised student assessment reliable? CTI Actile Leaming
  19. Are we ready enough to learnfrom interactive multimedia, doi
  20. (1989). Artificial Intelligence A Knowledge-Based Approach,
  21. Aspects ofmulti-media production in the United Kingdom, doi
  22. Assessing Active Learning,
  23. (1993). Assessing More Students,
  24. (1995). Assessing Student Centred Courses,
  25. CAPE: A computer program to assist with practical assessment doi
  26. Changes in the marking standard and reliability of successive assessments ofpractical skills in science, doi
  27. (1987). Classroom Testing on the Microcomputer, Business Education Forum,
  28. (1994). Computer aided assessments in pharmaceutical microbiology,
  29. Computer assisted assessment in the Teaching ad Learning Technology Programme
  30. (1994). Computer based assessment: some issuesfor consideration,
  31. (1987). Computer Software Applications in Chemistry, doi
  32. Computer-assisted test construction in chemistry (CS), doi
  33. Computer-assisted testing: In technical subjects (CS), doi
  34. (1990). Computer-Based Testing
  35. Computerized grading offteshman chemistry laboratory experiments doi
  36. Computerized quizzes with instant grading and response analysis doi
  37. Computers in Assessment,
  38. Construct problem-solving MCQs, doi
  39. Construct validity of computer based tests, 198 8, In H.
  40. (1984). Constructing and Using Computer-Based Formative Test, Educational Technology,
  41. CPS: a self-assessment scheme, doi
  42. (1984). Current Issues in Interactive Videodisc and Computer-Based Instruction, Instructional Innovator,,
  43. Design ofan intelligent on-line examination system, doi
  44. Development and the use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students' misconceptions in science, doi
  45. Device interfacingfor multi-media CAL: part 2,
  46. (1979). Does the position matter?
  47. Educational Diagnostic Assessment,
  48. Effects ofMicrocom uter-Administered Diagnostic Testing on Immediate and Continuing Science Achievement andAttitudes,
  49. Engineering the Human-Computer Interface doi
  50. (1993). Evaluating interactive multimedia courseware -a methodology, Computers and Education, doi
  51. (1993). Evaluating multimedia applications, Coinputers and Education,
  52. Examination grades: how many should there be? doi
  53. (1994). Examine: a seĆ½flassessment system for Windows and Macintosh, Cl'l Active Leaming
  54. f-paced learning with videofor undergraduates: a multimedia Keller Plan, doi
  55. (1994). Freedom andflexibility in the higher education examination process,
  56. Getting it together: the co-production, involving planning, coordinating and control, ofa multimedia course, Educational Media I. doi
  57. Guidelinesfor Computer-Based Testing of Student Learning
  58. Guidelinesfor Multimedia Courseware Developers
  59. Guidelinesfor the production ofHypertext Documents
  60. Headings within multiple-choice tests asfacilitators of test performance, doi
  61. How ", beyond the "what ", towards the "why ": a rule-assessment approach to achievement testing, doi
  62. How important is question sequence?
  63. Humanizing the multiple-choice test with partial credit, doi
  64. Hypertext and compact discs: the challenge of multi-media learning, doi
  65. (1994). Improving Student Learning Through Assessment and Evaluation,
  66. Interactive and multi-media systemsfor individual open learning, doi
  67. (1994). Interactive multimedia computer based assessment CTI Active Learning
  68. Is more always better?: the separate and combined effects ofa computer and video programme on mathematics learning, doi
  69. Justifying the selection of answers in multiple-choice items, doi
  70. Matrexam :a newform of computer-graded examination, doi
  71. Microcomputer generated interactive repeatable general chemistry examinations doi
  72. Microcomputer-based systemforfiling test questions and assembling examinations doi
  73. Microsoft Visual Basic: a way to quick and easy courseware?
  74. Moving to multimedia,
  75. Multi-media in education: bane or boon? doi
  76. Multi-media in the making,
  77. (1992). Multimedia and thefuture ofdistance learning technology,
  78. Multimedia chemistry lectures, doi
  79. Multimedia in education, doi
  80. (1994). Multimedia Supplement ppxii Added Attraction,
  81. (1994). Multimedia views ofscience education, doi
  82. Multimedia-interactive media, doi
  83. (1994). Multimedia: how do they do that? Training Technology and Human Resources,
  84. Multiple-choice achievement tests are improved with the option "none of these",,
  85. Multiple-Choice Computer Diagnostic Test Designs,
  86. Multiple-choice questions: fact, fallacy andfancy, doi
  87. (1986). Multiple-choice tests - arefour options as good asfive?
  88. Multiple-choice tests and the computer, doi
  89. (1992). Multiple-choices: testing in the United States, Education,
  90. New computer-graded examination allowing partial credit, doi
  91. Not like a book,
  92. Optical mark reading technology, doi
  93. Organic Chemistry, doi
  94. Others, A Comparison ofSelf-Adapted and Computerized Adaptive Tests,
  95. Positive and negative multiple-choice items: how different are they? doi
  96. Principles offtem Banking, Evaluation in Education:
  97. Progress in multiple-choice scoring methods, 1977-81, doi
  98. (1994). Question Mark Designerfor Windows,
  99. Question Mark Professional and the multimedia extensions to it,
  100. Recent developments in the scoring of multiple-choice items, doi
  101. Reliability ofa computerized scoring routine for an open-ended task; doi
  102. (1995). Research In Assessment XII Science Ain't Easy, RSC Assessment Subject Group,
  103. (1994). Review Using Technology to Assess Student Learning,
  104. (1983). Role ofgrammatical clues in multiple-choice questions: an empirical study, doi
  105. (1989). Scoring to remove guessing in multiple-choice examinations, doi
  106. (1987). SeĆ½f-Adqpted Testing: A Performance-Improving Variant of Computerized Adaptive Testing, doi
  107. (1987). Software Reviews, Science and Children,
  108. Some effects of changes in question structure and sequence on performance in a multiple-choice chemistry test, doi
  109. Some issues related to the use ofjustifications to multiple-choice answers, doi
  110. (1987). Some notes on the terms "validity" and "reliability". doi
  111. Sorefinger items in multiple-choice tests, doi
  112. (1994). Strategiesfor Diversifying Assessment
  113. (1991). Students'degree project as an efficient test discriminator, doi
  114. (1994). Swifter Assessment,
  115. (1994). Synopse report Advanced solutions to courseware development,
  116. (1995). Teaching With Multimedia,
  117. The adult tutor in a multi-media society,
  118. The application of multimedia CD-ROMS in schools,
  119. (1984). The application ofcomputer technology in the assessment oflarge undergraduate classes, doi
  120. (1981). The assessment ofpartial knowledge in multiple-choice chemistry examinations, Thesis
  121. The effect of language on student performance on multiple-choice tests in chemistry, doi
  122. The Effect ofMedia andAmount ofMicrocomputer Experience on Examination Scores,
  123. (1989). The Four Generations of Computerized Education Measurement, doi
  124. (1993). The practical side of chemistry,
  125. The Use and Capture of1mages For Computer-Based Learning,
  126. The use and evaluation of videodiscs in the chemistry laboratory, doi
  127. The Use of Computers doi
  128. The validity ofreliability measures,
  129. Theories oflearning and multimedia applications: an overview,
  130. Understanding IT A Review ofHypermedia A uthoring Packages,
  131. (1994). Using computer assisted assessment: time saver or sophisticated distraction?,
  132. (1992). Using Question Mark to evaluate your teaching,
  133. (1993). Using Technology To Assess Student Learning,
  134. (1994). Visual Basic Professional 3.0, ITTI, Understanding IT: A Review of Hypennedia Authoring Packages
  135. (1995). When interactive multimedia is not truly interactive, CTI Active Leaming,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.