Article thumbnail

Making sense of ratings: A common quantitative feedback ontology

By F. Marienfeld, E. Höfig, A. Horch, M. Kintz and J. Finzen


This paper proposes a common ontology for ratings, i.e. for quantitative user feedback data. Such a framework allows for semantic interoperability of data that adheres to it, which in turn enables the re-use, by making it independent from the original system. In contrast to prior attempts to establish an unambiguous vocabulary, this approach introduces two components that are in our view necessary to formally understand what a userâs rating actually means. The first is the aspect or facet, i.e. the viewing angle that was chosen to look at the rated thing. The second is the meta-model of scales following the scales of measurement that are widely used in descriptive statistics. So in plain words, we allow to formally specify how many out of how many score points something gets and with re gards to what. We follow the open world assumption of the Web Ontology Language (OWL) and design a vocabulary that is not specific to any domain. In turn, we rely on the premise that all domain specific concepts are available as semantic web resources with appropriate URIs

Topics: rating, semantic web
Year: 2011
OAI identifier:
Provided by: Fraunhofer-ePrints
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • (external link)
  • Suggested articles

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.